Yasser and Child Support Registrar (Child support)
Case
•
[2020] AATA 879
•5 February 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Yasser and Child Support Registrar (Child support) [2020] AATA 879
[2020] AATA 879
5 February 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) considered the matter of *Yasser and Child Support Registrar*. The applicant, Yasser, sought an extension of time to lodge an objection against a decision made by the Child Support Registrar.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether to grant Yasser an extension of time to lodge his objection. This involved assessing whether there was a satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging the objection out of time, and whether there were any prospects of the objection succeeding.
The Tribunal found that Yasser had not provided a satisfactory explanation for the significant delay in lodging his objection. While acknowledging that there were some prospects of the objection succeeding on its merits, the Tribunal concluded that this was insufficient to outweigh the lack of a reasonable explanation for the lateness. Consequently, the Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Child Support Registrar to refuse the extension of time.
The Tribunal was required to determine whether to grant Yasser an extension of time to lodge his objection. This involved assessing whether there was a satisfactory explanation for the delay in lodging the objection out of time, and whether there were any prospects of the objection succeeding.
The Tribunal found that Yasser had not provided a satisfactory explanation for the significant delay in lodging his objection. While acknowledging that there were some prospects of the objection succeeding on its merits, the Tribunal concluded that this was insufficient to outweigh the lack of a reasonable explanation for the lateness. Consequently, the Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Child Support Registrar to refuse the extension of time.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Ingram-Nader v Brinks Australia Pty Ltd
[2006] FCA 624
Murchison, Ian McKenzie v Keating, Paul John
[1984] FCA 176
Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor
[1996] HCA 25