Xun and Han

In the matter of *Xun and Han*, heard before Judge Burchardt, the dispute concerned applications to vary or discharge a Watch List Order made on 24 December 2014. The applicants sought to have this order set aside, while the respondent sought to maintain its operation.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the circumstances warranted the continuation or discharge of the existing Watch List Order. This required the court to consider the evidence presented by both parties and assess whether the grounds for the original order still subsisted or if there had been a material change in circumstances justifying its variation or dismissal.

Judge Burchardt considered the evidence and submissions of both parties. The court applied the principles governing the making and continuation of Watch List Orders, which typically involve assessing risks and the need for protective measures. After careful consideration, the court found that the grounds for the original order remained valid and that the order should continue in force.

Consequently, all extant applications to dismiss or vary the Watch List Order were dismissed. The court ordered that the Watch List Order made on 24 December 2014 remain in full force and effect.