Xiying Susan Guo v David Bilanycz
Case
•
[2010] ATMO 123
•8 December 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Xiying Susan Guo v David Bilanycz [2010] ATMO 123
[2010] ATMO 123
8 December 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This decision concerns an application by Xiying Susan Guo for a late extension of time to file a notice of opposition to trade mark application number 1325114, for the mark KINGYIELD. The application was heard by Alison Windsor, a Hearing Officer for Trade Marks and Designs.
The primary legal issue before the Hearing Officer was whether Ms Guo had provided sufficient reasons to justify her failure to file the notice of opposition within the statutory period. The Hearing Officer was required to determine if the circumstances warranted granting a late extension of time under the relevant regulations.
The Hearing Officer found that Ms Guo had not provided persuasive information that would satisfy her that there were sufficient reasons for the delay. Applying the provisions of subregulation 5.4(4), which the Hearing Officer noted did not allow for discretion, the application for a late extension of time was refused. Consequently, the trade mark KINGYIELD was permitted to proceed to registration one month after the date of the decision, unless the Registrar was notified of an appeal.
The primary legal issue before the Hearing Officer was whether Ms Guo had provided sufficient reasons to justify her failure to file the notice of opposition within the statutory period. The Hearing Officer was required to determine if the circumstances warranted granting a late extension of time under the relevant regulations.
The Hearing Officer found that Ms Guo had not provided persuasive information that would satisfy her that there were sufficient reasons for the delay. Applying the provisions of subregulation 5.4(4), which the Hearing Officer noted did not allow for discretion, the application for a late extension of time was refused. Consequently, the trade mark KINGYIELD was permitted to proceed to registration one month after the date of the decision, unless the Registrar was notified of an appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Intellectual Property
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Coca-Cola Amatil (Aust) Pty Limited v Cafedirect Plc [2012] ATMO 34
Cases Citing This Decision
3
Bridgestone Corporation v Zylux Distribution Pty Ltd
[2013] ATMO 19
Coca-Cola Amatil (Aust) Pty Limited v Cafedirect Plc
[2012] ATMO 34
Overdrive Holdings Pty Ltd v Bram Lagrou
[2011] ATMO 72
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
0
Chiron Corporation v Registrar of Trade Marks
[1998] FCA 928