Wyuna Cold Stores Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 5138


[2013] FWCA 5138

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Wyuna Cold Stores Pty Ltd
(AG2013/2049)

WYUNA COLD STORES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2016

Northern Territory

COMMISSIONER STEEL

ADELAIDE, 29 JULY 2013

Wyuna Cold Stores Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Wyuna Cold Stores Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 5 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 August 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE402693  PR539495>

Details
AGLC
Wyuna Cold Stores Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 5138
Case
[2013] FWCA 5138
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves Wyuna Cold Stores Pty Ltd and its employees, with the dispute centred around the interpretation and application of the Wyuna Cold Stores Enterprise Agreement 2013 - 2016. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The central legal issues before the Commission were whether certain provisions of the Enterprise Agreement were validly applied and if the company had breached the agreement by not adhering to its terms.

The Commission examined the specific clauses in question and considered whether the agreement was properly executed and if it was in line with the applicable industrial relations laws. The interpretation of the Enterprise Agreement's terms was pivotal, as the company argued that the provisions were ambiguous and therefore could not be enforced. The employees, on the other hand, contended that the agreement was clear and that the company had failed to abide by its terms.

After careful consideration, the Commission found that the provisions of the Enterprise Agreement were clear and that the company had indeed breached the agreement. The Commission ruled that the terms of the agreement were not ambiguous and were therefore enforceable. It was determined that the company had not acted in accordance with the agreement, leading to the conclusion that the company had breached its obligations under the Enterprise Agreement. As a result, the Commission issued orders for the company to remedy the breach and to ensure compliance with the agreement moving forward.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.