Wu v Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia
Case
•
[2022] NSWCA 102
•22 June 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Wu v Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia [2022] NSWCA 102
[2022] NSWCA 102
22 June 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant, Ms. Wu, sought a referral for pro bono legal assistance under rule 7.36 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (UCPR) in proceedings before Gleeson JA of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The application arose in the context of an appeal where the grounds of appeal did not clearly identify a question of law.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether Ms. Wu met the criteria for a referral for pro bono legal assistance under UCPR r 7.36. This rule requires, among other things, that the applicant demonstrate a lack of financial means and that the case involves a question of law.
Gleeson JA found that Ms. Wu had not established the necessary grounds for a referral. Her Honour noted that the grounds of appeal did not articulate a clear question of law, a prerequisite for such a referral. Furthermore, the Court was not satisfied that Ms. Wu was entirely without financial means, nor that she would be receptive to legal advice regarding potential defects in her case, which is an implicit consideration in assessing the utility of legal representation.
Consequently, the appellant’s application for referral for legal assistance under UCPR r 7.36 was dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether Ms. Wu met the criteria for a referral for pro bono legal assistance under UCPR r 7.36. This rule requires, among other things, that the applicant demonstrate a lack of financial means and that the case involves a question of law.
Gleeson JA found that Ms. Wu had not established the necessary grounds for a referral. Her Honour noted that the grounds of appeal did not articulate a clear question of law, a prerequisite for such a referral. Furthermore, the Court was not satisfied that Ms. Wu was entirely without financial means, nor that she would be receptive to legal advice regarding potential defects in her case, which is an implicit consideration in assessing the utility of legal representation.
Consequently, the appellant’s application for referral for legal assistance under UCPR r 7.36 was dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
3
M v Director General, Department of Family and Community Services
[2013] NSWCA 118
Renshaw v New South Wales Lotteries Corporation Pty Ltd
[2021] NSWCA 41