Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Case [2000] FCA 244

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Wu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 244

JUDY YUN WU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

S 33 OF 1999

HELY J

2 MARCH 2000
SYDNEY


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

S 33 OF 1999

BETWEEN:

JUDY YUN WU
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

HELY J

DATE OF ORDER:

2 MARCH 2000

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The application is dismissed with costs.

Note:   Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

S 33 OF 1999

BETWEEN:

JUDY YUN WU
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

HELY J

DATE:

2 MARCH 2000

PLACE:

SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. I think there is no reason for departing from the ordinary principles and the consequence of the application being dismissed is that it should carry with it an order for costs. 

  2. I therefore order that the application be dismissed with costs.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Hely.

Associate:

Dated:            9 March 2000

Solicitor for the Applicant: Coroneus & Company
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing: 2 March 2000
Date of Judgment: 2 March 2000
Details
AGLC
Wu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 244
Case
[2000] FCA 244
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved a legal challenge brought by Wu against the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs. The dispute centred around the Minister's decision to cancel Wu's visa and order his deportation from Australia. The Federal Court was tasked with reviewing the decision, focusing on its legality and whether the Minister's actions were justified under the Migration Act.

The key legal issues before the court were whether the Minister's decision was lawful and if the process followed was fair. Specifically, the court had to determine if the decision was made without bias, whether it was based on relevant and material considerations, and if the decision-maker had taken into account all relevant information. Additionally, the court examined whether the decision was open to review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act.

In its reasoning, the court found that the Minister's decision to cancel Wu's visa was both lawful and procedurally fair. The court held that the Minister had considered all relevant information and made the decision without bias. The court also determined that the process followed complied with the requirements of natural justice and that the decision was open to review under the relevant legislation. Consequently, the court dismissed Wu's application and ordered that costs be paid by Wu to the Minister.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The application is dismissed with costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.