Worth and Price and Anor

The Family Court of Australia, presided over by Foster J, considered a dispute concerning the parental responsibility and living arrangements for a child, B. The parties involved were the child's paternal grandmother, Ms Worth (the second respondent), and presumably the child's parents, although their specific roles as applicants or respondents are not detailed in the provided text. The core of the dispute revolved around determining who should have sole parental responsibility for B and where B should live.

The central legal issues before the Court were to determine: (1) who should have sole parental responsibility for the child B; and (2) with whom the child B should live. These determinations are fundamental to the welfare and best interests of the child, which is the paramount consideration in all family law matters concerning children in Australia.

In reaching its decision, the Court ordered that the second respondent, Ms Worth, the child's paternal grandmother, be granted sole parental responsibility for B. Furthermore, the Court ordered that B live with Ms Worth. While the specific reasoning behind these orders is not elaborated in the provided text, the outcome clearly indicates that the Court found it to be in the child's best interests for the paternal grandmother to have both the ultimate decision-making authority and the primary residence of the child.