| [2025] FWCA 1216 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Workfast Infrastructure Pty Ltd
(AG2025/790)
WORKFAST INFRASTRUCTURE PTY LTD & THE AUSTRALIAN WORKERS’ UNION MAJOR PROJECTS AGREEMENT 2025
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER ALLISON | MELBOURNE, 11 APRIL 2025 |
Application for approval of the Workfast Infrastructure Pty Ltd & The Australian Workers’ Union Major Projects Agreement 2025.
Workfast Infrastructure Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application, pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Workfast Infrastructure Pty Ltd & The Australian Workers’ Union Major Projects Agreement 2025 (the Agreement).
The Australian Workers’ Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The application was required to be filed within 14 days after it was made on 5 March 2025 in accordance with s.185(3) of the Act. As it was not filed until 24 March 2025, it was filed five days after the expiry of the statutory timeframe. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances, I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application.
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights that was issued to the employees was not in the form prescribed by the regulations. I am satisfied that this was a minor procedural or technical error and that the employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by it. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act to disregard this error.
Clause 23.5 of the Agreement, relating to casual conversion, may be inconsistent with Employee Choice casual conversion requests made in accordance with s.66AAB-AAD of the Act. However, noting clause 6.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 18 April 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2029.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE528633 PR786010>
- AGLC
- Workfast Infrastructure Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1216
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 1216
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court revolved around whether the proposed agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in terms of its fairness and compliance with the objectives of the Act. The court needed to determine if the agreement provided for fair terms and conditions of employment, and if it aligned with the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act, including promoting high levels of employment and the avoidance of unprotected industrial action.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the proposed agreement in detail, considering various factors such as the adequacy of the terms and conditions, the balance of rights and obligations between the employer and employees, and the overall fairness of the agreement. The Commission found that the agreement provided for fair terms and conditions of employment and was in line with the objectives of the Fair Work Act. The court approved the agreement, emphasising the importance of maintaining fair and balanced industrial relations.
The final orders of the court were that the Workfast Infrastructure Pty Ltd and The Australian Workers' Union Major Projects Agreement 2025 be approved and registered with the Fair Work Commission. This decision sets a precedent for future agreements between the parties and reinforces the importance of fair and balanced industrial relations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.