| [2018] FWCA 3203 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Woomelang and District Bush Nursing Centre Inc
(AG2018/783)
WOOMELANG AND DISTRICT BUSH NURSING CENTRE NURSES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Health and welfare services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 4 JUNE 2018 |
Woomelang and District Bush Nursing Centre Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Woomelang and District Bush Nursing Centre Nurses Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Woomelang and District Bush Nursing Centre Inc. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 4 June 2018 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 11 June 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428649 PR607744>
- AGLC
- Woomelang and District Bush Nursing Centre Inc [2018] FWCA 3203
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3203
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included the interpretation of various clauses within the enterprise agreement, particularly those related to shift allowances and the calculation of penalty rates. The Commission had to ascertain whether the agreement was compliant with the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it adequately protected the employees' rights. Additionally, the Commission was required to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it was appropriate to make an order for the agreement to be registered with the Fair Work Commission.
In reaching its decision, the Commission closely examined the wording of the enterprise agreement and the context in which it was made. The Commission found that certain clauses were ambiguous and did not clearly reflect the parties' intentions. Consequently, the Commission exercised its power to interpret the agreement in a manner that would best achieve a fair and reasonable outcome for both parties. The Commission ultimately determined that the agreement was not in compliance with the Fair Work Act and that certain provisions were invalid. As a result, the Commission made an order for the registration of the enterprise agreement with modifications to address the identified issues.
The Fair Work Commission's final order required the employer to implement the modified enterprise agreement, which included specific provisions regarding shift allowances and penalty rates. The order also mandated that the employer provide written notice to the employees of the changes within a specified timeframe. This decision underscores the importance of clear and precise language in enterprise agreements to ensure they are enforceable and protect the rights of both employers and employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.