Woolley and Dickinson
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 1819
•11 September 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Woolley and Dickinson [2014] FCCA 1819
[2014] FCCA 1819
11 September 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application by the father, Mr Woolley, for orders regarding his contact with his child, X, and the mother, Ms Dickinson. The proceedings were before Judge McGuire in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
The court was required to determine the nature and extent of contact the father should have with the child, X, given the circumstances of the case. This involved considering the child's best interests and the need for appropriate safeguards in the father's interactions with X and the mother.
Judge McGuire ordered that previous orders be discharged and made new orders concerning the father's contact with X. These new orders stipulated supervised contact at a contact centre, with specific restrictions on the father's presence near the centre during changeovers. The father was also restrained from communicating with or approaching the mother directly, and from interrogating X about her mother or attempting to elicit personal details. Furthermore, the father was prohibited from contacting X directly or indirectly outside the strict terms of the orders, including attending at X's school or events. Communication with X was limited to letters, cards, and gifts on specific occasions, to be sent via a third party. The mother was permitted to inspect, edit, or withhold these communications, with any edited or withheld items to be provided to the independent children's lawyer. The mother was also directed to encourage X to reply to the father's communications, subject to the same conditions. Liberty to apply was granted to the parties and the independent children's lawyer, and the matter was listed for mention and directions.
The court was required to determine the nature and extent of contact the father should have with the child, X, given the circumstances of the case. This involved considering the child's best interests and the need for appropriate safeguards in the father's interactions with X and the mother.
Judge McGuire ordered that previous orders be discharged and made new orders concerning the father's contact with X. These new orders stipulated supervised contact at a contact centre, with specific restrictions on the father's presence near the centre during changeovers. The father was also restrained from communicating with or approaching the mother directly, and from interrogating X about her mother or attempting to elicit personal details. Furthermore, the father was prohibited from contacting X directly or indirectly outside the strict terms of the orders, including attending at X's school or events. Communication with X was limited to letters, cards, and gifts on specific occasions, to be sent via a third party. The mother was permitted to inspect, edit, or withhold these communications, with any edited or withheld items to be provided to the independent children's lawyer. The mother was also directed to encourage X to reply to the father's communications, subject to the same conditions. Liberty to apply was granted to the parties and the independent children's lawyer, and the matter was listed for mention and directions.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Woolley and Dickinson [2014] FCCA 1819
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
PST & CPR
[2006] FMCAfam 36
Sampson and Marsh
[2007] FamCA 1554