[2014] FWCA 1408 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Woody's Installations Pty Ltd
(AG2014/214)
WOODY'S INSTALLATIONS PTY LTD / AMWU METAL WORKER ON-SITE CONSTRUCTION COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT FOR NSW 2013-2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 27 FEBRUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Woody's Installations Pty Ltd / AMWU Metal Worker On-Site Construction Collective Agreement for NSW 2013-2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as Woody’s Installations Pty Ltd / AMWU Metal Worker On-Site Construction Collective Agreement for NSW 2013-2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Woody’s Installations Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (the Union) have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2014.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE407054 PR548186>
- AGLC
- Woody's Installations Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1408
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1408
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the collective agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Specifically, the FWC had to determine if the agreement complied with the provisions regarding good faith bargaining and the best interests of the employees. The FWC also had to ensure that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage any party involved and that it was consistent with the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act.
The FWC examined the bargaining process and the terms of the agreement. The Commission found that the agreement was the result of good faith bargaining and was in the best interests of the employees. The FWC noted that the agreement provided for fair wages and conditions, and that it did not unfairly disadvantage any party. The FWC also found that the agreement was consistent with the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act. Based on these findings, the FWC approved the collective agreement.
The FWC's decision to approve the collective agreement was based on its determination that the agreement met the legal requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. The FWC found that the agreement was the result of good faith bargaining, was in the best interests of the employees, and was consistent with the broader objectives of the Act. The FWC's approval of the agreement ensures that it can be enforced as a binding award, providing certainty and stability to the parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.