| [2025] FWCA 2434 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Woods Signalling Service Pty Ltd
(AG2025/2317)
WOODS SIGNALLING SERVICE PTY LTD AND CEPU ELECTRICAL DIVISION QUEENSLAND CROSS RIVER RAIL PROJECT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025-2027
| Electrical contracting industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT COLMAN | MELBOURNE, 23 JULY 2025 |
Application for approval of the Woods Signalling Service Pty Ltd and CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Cross River Rail Project Enterprise Agreement 2025-2027
Woods Signalling Service Pty Ltd has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Woods Signalling Service Pty Ltd and CEPU Electrical Division Queensland Cross River Rail Project Enterprise Agreement 2025-2027 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
This is a greenfields agreement that meets the requirements of s 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval has been met. In accordance with s 187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that the employee organisation that will be covered by the Agreement is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
The Agreement was approved on 23 July 2025.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE529800 PR789956>
- AGLC
- Woods Signalling Service Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 2434
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 2434
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the statutory criteria for approval. This required assessing whether the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees, and whether it was consistent with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission needed to ensure that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage employees and that it had been made in good faith.
The Fair Work Commission carefully examined the proposed agreement, considering factors such as the bargaining power of the parties, the nature of the agreement, and the interests of the employees. After thorough deliberation, the Commission determined that the agreement did not meet the statutory criteria for approval. It was found that the proposed agreement did not provide a fair and reasonable outcome for the employees. Consequently, the Commission rejected the application for approval of the enterprise agreement. This decision was based on the conclusion that the agreement contained terms that were not fair and reasonable, and did not adequately protect the interests of the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.