| [2018] FWCA 3314 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Wood Group PSN Australia Pty Ltd T/A Wood
(AG2017/6580)
WGPSN (Melbourne Metropolitan Water O&M) Enterprise Agreement 2017
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| Commissioner Johns | SYDNEY, 6 JUNE 2018 |
Application for approval of the WGPSN (Melbourne Metropolitan Water O&M) Enterprise Agreement 2017.
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the WGPSN (Melbourne Metropolitan Water O&M) Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Wood Group PSN Australia Pty Ltd T/A Wood. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 13 June 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE428712 PR607883>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Wood Group PSN Australia Pty Ltd T/A Wood [2018] FWCA 3314
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3314
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission carefully examined the agreement to ensure it met all necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act 2009, including whether it was made in good faith and whether it covered a broad range of employees. The Commission also considered whether the agreement was likely to provide better outcomes for the employees than the applicable award. The Commission found that the agreement was largely compliant and did provide better outcomes, thus meeting the statutory requirements and being in the employees' interests. The agreement was approved by the Commission, reflecting its view that the terms were fair and beneficial for the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.