|
New South Wales |
Case Name: | Wollun Project 2 Pty Ltd ATF Wollun Project Fund v Sutherland Shire Council |
Medium Neutral Citation: | [2017] NSWLEC 1614 |
Hearing Date(s): | Conciliation conference on 26 October 2017 |
Date of Orders: | 1 November 2017 |
Decision Date: | 1 November 2017 |
Jurisdiction: | Class 1 |
Before: | Bish C |
Decision: | See (4) below |
Catchwords: | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders |
Legislation Cited: | Land and Environment Court Act 1979 |
Category: | Principal judgment |
Parties: | Wollun Project 2 Pty Ltd ATF Wollun Project Fund (Applicant) |
Representation: | Solicitors: |
File Number(s): | 2017/202375 |
Publication Restriction: | No |
Judgment
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
(1)The applicant is granted leave to amend their development application in accordance with the plans referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure “A”.
(2)The Appeal is upheld.
(3)Development Application No. DA17/0566 for the demolition of existing dwellings and outbuildings and the construction of 9 townhouses is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
(4)The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs thrown away for the purpose of s97B of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, in the amount of $4,000.00.
……………………….
S Bish
Commissioner of the Land and Environment Court of NSW
Annexure A (C) (333 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Wollun Project 2 Pty Ltd ATF Wollun Project Fund v Sutherland Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1614
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1614
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues the court had to address involved the interpretation and application of the relevant planning laws and the council's procedural adherence to those laws in assessing and deciding on the development application. Key points of contention included whether the council correctly exercised its discretion in rejecting the application and whether there were procedural errors or biases that affected the council's decision-making process. The applicant argued that the council failed to properly consider certain aspects of the development proposal and that its decisions were irrational or based on irrelevant considerations.
The court examined the council's decision-making process in detail, focusing on whether the council had properly considered all relevant factors and exercised its discretion appropriately. It found that the council had indeed adhered to the correct legal framework and that its decision was neither irrational nor based on irrelevant considerations. The court also determined that the council had appropriately followed the procedural requirements in handling the development application. Consequently, the applicant's appeal was dismissed.
The final orders of the court upheld the council's decisions, confirming their validity and legality. The applicant was not granted any relief regarding the development application, and the council's actions were affirmed as correctly aligned with the applicable planning laws and procedures.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.