Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Wisdom v Sutherland Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 656
PARTIES: Applicant:
Clive WisdomRespondent:
Sutherland Shire CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 10591 of 2005
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- privacy
DATES OF HEARING: 17/11/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 11/17/2005
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Applicant:
Mr A Markham, council solicitor
Mr M Ball, agent
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALESRoseth SC
17 November 2005
JUDGMENT10591 of 2005 Clive Wisdom v Sutherland Shire Council
1 Senior Commissioner: This is an appeal against the refusal by Sutherland Shire Council (the council) of a development application to modify Development Consent 04/0417. That consent approved a first-floor addition to the existing single-storey house on the site. The amendment seeks to extend the rear balcony to the full width of the first floor. The parties have reached agreement and seek consent orders.
2 The main issue in the case is the privacy of three properties, 1/18, 2/18 and 20 Alkaringa Road, Miranda. The applicant has amended the proposal by adding privacy screens to a height of 1.7m so that there will be no outlook towards No 20 and the rear yards of Nos 1/18 and 2/18. The owner of No 20 has declared himself to be satisfied. However, Mr J Faddy of No 2/18 and Mr K and Mrs L Thomson of No 1/18 remain objectors.
3 None of the objectors was present at the on-site hearing. I am satisfied that the 1.7m-high screen will shield the rear yards of Nos 1/18 and 2/18. For that reason, I agree to the granting of consent orders.
- Orders
1. The appeal is upheld.
2. Application to modify Development Consent 04/0417, granted on 13 January 2005 in respect of 18 Alkaringa Road, Miranda, is determined by the granting of consent, subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
3. No order on costs.
4. Exhibit A is retained on the court’s files.
- ______________________
Dr John Roseth
Senior Commissioner
- AGLC
- Wisdom v Sutherland Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 656
- Case
- [2005] NSWLEC 656
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant had amended the proposal by adding privacy screens reaching a height of 1.7m to prevent any outlook towards No 20 and the rear yards of Nos 1/18 and 2/18. The owner of No 20 expressed satisfaction with the revised plan, but Mr J Faddy of No 2/18 and Mr K and Mrs L Thomson of No 1/18 remained objectors. Notably, none of the objectors attended the on-site hearing. The Senior Commissioner, Dr John Roseth, concluded that the 1.7m-high screens would adequately shield the rear yards of Nos 1/18 and 2/18, thereby upholding the appeal and granting consent orders to modify the development consent.
The court issued several orders to formalise the consent. The appeal was upheld, and the application to modify Development Consent 04/0417, granted on 13 January 2005 for 18 Alkaringa Road, Miranda, was approved subject to specific conditions. Additionally, no order was made regarding costs, and Exhibit A was retained on the court's files. This decision ensured that the modified development would proceed while maintaining the privacy of the neighbouring properties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.