| [2015] FWCA 4689 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Wilson Mining Services Pty Ltd
(AG2015/3851)
WILSON MINING SERVICES PTY LTD - NSW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Coal industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 10 JULY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Wilson Mining Services Pty Ltd - NSW Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Wilson Mining Services Pty Ltd - NSW Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and will operate from 17 July 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 years from approval.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE414737 PR569284>
- AGLC
- Wilson Mining Services Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 4689
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4689
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission carefully examined the provisions of the agreement and the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process. It considered whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions. The Commission found that while there were some shortcomings in the agreement, they were not of such a nature as to invalidate the entire agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the essential elements of the agreement, including the payment of minimum wages and reasonable conditions of employment, were adequately covered. The process of negotiation, although not perfect, was deemed to be fair and reasonable overall. As such, the Commission approved the agreement with minor modifications to address the identified issues.
In conclusion, the Fair Work Commission approved the Wilson Mining Services Pty Ltd - NSW Enterprise Agreement 2015, with certain modifications to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements. The Commission found that, while there were procedural and substantive shortcomings, they did not prevent the agreement from being approved. The modifications required by the Commission were relatively minor and aimed at ensuring that the agreement met all necessary legal standards. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to both the letter and spirit of the Fair Work Act when drafting and negotiating enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.