Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWCA 3081


[2023] FWCA 3081

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd

(AG2023/3216)

SUGAR AUSTRALIA - RACECOURSE REFINERY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023

Sugar industry

COMMISSIONER CONNOLLY

MELBOURNE, 22 SEPTEMBER 2023

Application for approval of the Sugar Australia - Racecourse Refinery Enterprise Agreement 2023

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sugar Australia - Racecourse Refinery Enterprise Agreement 2023 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 15 September 2023.

  1. The notification time for the Agreement under s.173(2) was 15 November 2022 and the Agreement was made on 28 August 2023.  Accordingly, the genuine agreement requirements the Agreement is to be assessed under are those applying before 6 June 2023 and the better off overall test (BOOT) is that applying on and from 6 June 2023. [1] 

  1. On 19 September 2023, the Employer was invited to address aspects of the Agreement including through the provision of an undertaking.

  1. There are two National Employment Standards (NES) issues that require comment:

·   Abandonment of Employment – Clause 2.3(c) sets out circumstances where an employee is deemed to have abandoned their employment but does not specify that an employee is entitled to payment of notice of termination in accordance with ss. 117–123 of the Act (see Bienias v Iplex Pipelines Australia Pty Limited [2017] FWCFB 38 at [58]).

·   Personal Leave (Accrual) – Clause 8.1(c) states that an employee is entitled to accrue 84 hours of personal/carer’s leave, inconsistent with s.96(1) of the Act which specifies personal/carer’s leave in days.

  1. Clause 11.7 of the Agreement acts as an effective NES precedence clause, in that it states that “Where a term of this Agreement is inconsistent with a provision of the NES, the NES provision prevails to the extent of the inconsistency unless the Agreement term provides a more beneficial entitlement for the employee, in which case the Agreement term prevails”. As a result of the NES precedence clause, the above clauses will not apply to the extent that they are inconsistent with the NES.

  1. The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188, 190, 193 and 193A of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 30 June 2025.

COMMISSIONER


[1] The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act. Those changes broadly commenced operation on 6 June 2023, subject to various transitional arrangements that included those to effect described above.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE521611  PR766517>

Details
AGLC
Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 3081
Case
[2023] FWCA 3081
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Wilmar Sugar Pty Ltd sought approval for the Sugar Australia - Racecourse Refinery Enterprise Agreement 2023. The applicant, a sugar refining company, argued that the agreement, which had been negotiated between Sugar Australia and various employers, including Wilmar, was suitable for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was opposed by the National Tertiary Education Union, which raised concerns about the adequacy of the agreement, particularly regarding pay rates and conditions for certain employees.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under section 234 of the Act, specifically whether it provided for fair and reasonable pay and conditions, and whether it had been negotiated in good faith. The Commission examined the negotiation process, the terms of the agreement, and the submissions from both parties to determine if the agreement was fair and reasonable.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was appropriately negotiated in good faith and contained provisions that were fair and reasonable for the employees covered by the agreement. The Commission noted that the agreement included a pay rise for certain employees and addressed various working conditions. While acknowledging the union's concerns, the Commission determined that the overall terms of the agreement were appropriate for approval. The applicant satisfied the requirements for approval under the Act.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Sugar Australia - Racecourse Refinery Enterprise Agreement 2023, finding it to be fair and reasonable and negotiated in good faith. The decision was made in the interest of promoting harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.