Williams v Sutera
Case
•
[2012] NSWDC 163
•28 September 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Williams v Sutera [2012] NSWDC 163
[2012] NSWDC 163
28 September 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Williams was the plaintiff in the Federal Court, suing Sutera, the defendants, over a dispute relating to the lease of a service station. The plaintiff claimed damages for deceit based on alleged misrepresentations regarding the age of the underground petrol tanks at the premises. The defendants denied the claims and raised a cross-claim for mesne profit, non-payment of outgoings, and repairs. The court had to determine whether the alleged misrepresentations were made, whether they were relied upon by the plaintiff, and if the loss claimed by the plaintiff could be established as flowing from those representations. Additionally, the court needed to assess the validity and quantum of the defendants' cross-claim.
In addressing these issues, the court found that the plaintiff did not establish that the alleged representations were made or that they were relied upon. The court concluded that the loss claimed by the plaintiff could not be shown to have flowed from any such misrepresentations. Regarding the cross-claim, the court found in favour of the defendants, awarding them $28,800.68 in damages for mesne profit, non-payment of outgoings, and repairs. The court also ordered that the parties were to bring in Short Minutes of Order detailing the agreed total of interest on the judgment for the cross-claim and that the plaintiff was to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings. Finally, the court granted liberty to restore in relation to interest and costs, and ordered that exhibits be retained for 28 days.
In addressing these issues, the court found that the plaintiff did not establish that the alleged representations were made or that they were relied upon. The court concluded that the loss claimed by the plaintiff could not be shown to have flowed from any such misrepresentations. Regarding the cross-claim, the court found in favour of the defendants, awarding them $28,800.68 in damages for mesne profit, non-payment of outgoings, and repairs. The court also ordered that the parties were to bring in Short Minutes of Order detailing the agreed total of interest on the judgment for the cross-claim and that the plaintiff was to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings. Finally, the court granted liberty to restore in relation to interest and costs, and ordered that exhibits be retained for 28 days.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Tort Law
Legal Concepts
-
Misrepresentation
-
Reliance
-
Causation
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Williams v Sutera [2012] NSWDC 163
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
24
Statutory Material Cited
1
Keet v Ward
[2011] WASCA 139
Keet v Ward
[2011] WASCA 139
Et Petroleum Holdings P/L v Clarenden P/L
[2005] NSWSC 435