Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2021] FWCA 5267


[2021] FWCA 5267
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2021/6675)

WILLIAMS REFRIGERATION AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2021

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER LEE

MELBOURNE, 25 AUGUST 2021

Application for approval of the Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] I note that the notice of employee representational rights (NERR) provided to employees was printed on the employer’s letterhead, contains additional information regarding the structure of the “Enterprise Agreement Negotiating Committee”, and replaces the word “employer” with the name of the Operations Manager in the paragraph titled “Questions?”. As such, the NERR does not contain the content prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 in accordance with s.174(1A) of the Act. The Employer made the following submissions in relation to this issue, which I have considered:

“It is not likely that relevant employees were disadvantaged by the defects because there is strong evidence to suggest that a vast majority of employees (at least) were aware of their right to be represented in bargaining. Specifically:

a. The AMWU: was the default bargaining representative; was an active bargaining participant; is a signatory to the agreement; and filed a Form F18 in support of the agreement;

b. A separate employee “Enterprise Agreement Negotiating Committee” was established and participated in bargaining, which provided an alternate source of knowledge around bargaining and opportunity for input into bargaining for employees; and

c. The defects did not result in any critical information being removed from the prescribed form.”

[5] I am satisfied having regard to those submissions and the Full Bench decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Ltd T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others 1that the above matter constitutes minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of s.188(2)(a). Further, I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error.

[6] Accordingly, notwithstanding the matter identified in paragraph [4] above, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed to by the employees covered by the Agreement within the meaning of s.188 of the Act.

[7] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[8] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

  Clause 15.3 – Deductions upon Termination.

  Clause 19.4 – Absence before or after a public holiday.

  Clause 20.1 – Annual Leave.

However, noting clause 9 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 1 September 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE512870  PR733183>

Annexure A

 1   [2019] FWCFB 318.

Details
AGLC
Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 5267
Case
[2021] FWCA 5267
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd, represented by its Chief Executive Officer, applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021. The application was contested by the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, which argued that the proposed agreement did not meet the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. The dispute centred on the terms of the proposed agreement, particularly those related to wages, conditions of employment, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

The legal issues before the Commission involved whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the statutory provisions set out in the Fair Work Act, including the requirement for a genuine enterprise agreement. This involved examining whether the agreement was negotiated in good faith, whether it contained terms that were fair and reasonable, and whether it adhered to the procedural requirements for approval. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement provided adequate protections for employees, particularly in light of the contested provisions raised by the union.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the proposed enterprise agreement did indeed meet the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission determined that the agreement was negotiated in good faith, contained terms that were fair and reasonable, and complied with the procedural requirements of the Act. It was noted that the agreement provided appropriate protections for employees, including those in relation to wages, conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. Consequently, the application for approval was upheld, and the enterprise agreement was approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act.

The final orders of the Commission included the approval of the Williams Refrigeration Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2021, which was to be registered and in effect from the date of the decision. The Commission also directed that the agreement would be available for review and potential modification in accordance with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. This decision ensures that the terms of the enterprise agreement are legally binding and enforceable, providing a framework for industrial relations within the company.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.