WILKIE & KRIVKIN
Case
•
[2013] FamCA 489
•21 May 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
WILKIE & KRIVKIN
[2013] FamCA 489
[2013] FamCA 489
21 May 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter came before Aldridge J in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia concerning parenting orders for a child. The proceedings involved the husband and wife, with the husband having applied for the matter to be transferred to the Melbourne Registry, which was refused.
The court was required to determine the terms of interim parenting orders, specifically concerning the child's residence, the father's time with the child, and the disclosure of medical information. The husband also sought a transfer of the proceedings to a different registry.
Aldridge J made orders reflecting a minute agreed upon by the wife, which were largely adopted by the court. The child was ordered to live with the mother, and the father's time with the child was significantly restricted, requiring supervision by the wife's family members at their home in Sydney, with the supervisor having the ability to terminate the visit if the father's behaviour posed a risk. The father was also ordered to provide written authorities for the disclosure of the child's medical records to the wife's solicitors.
The court ordered that the husband's application for transfer to the Melbourne Registry be refused. Interim parenting orders were made, stipulating that the child live with the mother and detailing specific, supervised arrangements for the father's time with the child. The orders also included provisions for the disclosure of medical information and the division of personal property.
The court was required to determine the terms of interim parenting orders, specifically concerning the child's residence, the father's time with the child, and the disclosure of medical information. The husband also sought a transfer of the proceedings to a different registry.
Aldridge J made orders reflecting a minute agreed upon by the wife, which were largely adopted by the court. The child was ordered to live with the mother, and the father's time with the child was significantly restricted, requiring supervision by the wife's family members at their home in Sydney, with the supervisor having the ability to terminate the visit if the father's behaviour posed a risk. The father was also ordered to provide written authorities for the disclosure of the child's medical records to the wife's solicitors.
The court ordered that the husband's application for transfer to the Melbourne Registry be refused. Interim parenting orders were made, stipulating that the child live with the mother and detailing specific, supervised arrangements for the father's time with the child. The orders also included provisions for the disclosure of medical information and the division of personal property.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
WILKIE & KRIVKIN
[2013] FamCA 489
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1