Wigmans v AMP Ltd
Case
•
[2018] NSWSC 1118
•12 July 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Wigmans v AMP Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1118
[2018] NSWSC 1118
12 July 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants, Wigmans, sought an injunction against AMP Ltd, restraining the respondents from making any application in certain Federal Court proceedings regarding the conduct of the applicants' Supreme Court proceedings. The application also sought to prevent the respondents from taking further steps in relation to the conduct of those Federal Court proceedings. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicants were entitled to an injunction preventing the respondents from making an application in the Federal Court proceedings regarding the conduct of the Supreme Court proceedings. The court had to consider the appropriate circumstances in which such an injunction would be granted and the balance of convenience in favour of the applicants.
The court dismissed the notice of motion by consent. Both parties agreed that no further steps should be taken in relation to the conduct of the Federal Court proceedings. Consequently, the court made no order as to costs. The dismissal by consent indicates that both parties reached a mutual understanding regarding the proceedings and did not require the court to make a determination on the merits of the application.
No final orders were made by the court as the matter was dismissed by consent. The dismissal by consent signifies that the parties had resolved their differences and did not require the court to issue any specific orders.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicants were entitled to an injunction preventing the respondents from making an application in the Federal Court proceedings regarding the conduct of the Supreme Court proceedings. The court had to consider the appropriate circumstances in which such an injunction would be granted and the balance of convenience in favour of the applicants.
The court dismissed the notice of motion by consent. Both parties agreed that no further steps should be taken in relation to the conduct of the Federal Court proceedings. Consequently, the court made no order as to costs. The dismissal by consent indicates that both parties reached a mutual understanding regarding the proceedings and did not require the court to make a determination on the merits of the application.
No final orders were made by the court as the matter was dismissed by consent. The dismissal by consent signifies that the parties had resolved their differences and did not require the court to issue any specific orders.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Equitable Estoppel
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Equitable Estoppel
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Wigmans v AMP Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1118
Most Recent Citation
In the matter of Goldstone Private Equity VCMP LP (ILP2300030) [2025] NSWSC 410
Cases Citing This Decision
34
Wigmans v AMP Ltd
[2021] HCA 7
Aarons & Aarons
[2021] FamCA 530
Aarons & Aarons
[2021] FamCA 530
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
1
Wigmans v AMP Ltd
[2018] NSWSC 1045
CSR Ltd v Cigna Insurance Australia Ltd
[1997] HCA 33
PT Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd
[2015] HCA 36
Cited Sections