FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Widouri v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1543
DAVID WIDOURI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
N 429 OF 2001
HELY J
26 OCTOBER 2001
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 429 OF 2001
BETWEEN:
DAVID WIDOURI
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
HELY J
DATE OF ORDER:
26 OCTOBER 2001
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed with costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 429 OF 2001 BETWEEN:
DAVID WIDOURI
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
HELY J
DATE:
26 OCTOBER 2001
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant was present before a Registrar of this Court on 5 July 2001 when the matter was listed before me for hearing this morning. The applicant has not appeared. The Application for an Order of Review specifies certain grounds on which the application is made, without giving any particulars of those grounds. On 20 August 2001 the Australian Government Solicitor wrote to the applicant at the address named in the application, reminding him that the matter was listed for hearing this morning and drawing his attention to other outstanding matters.
The Australian Government Solicitor again wrote to the applicant on 18 October 2001 and 23 October 2001. The letter of 23 October 2001 again reminded the applicant of the hearing date, and enclosed a copy of the respondent's submissions. No response to any of those letters was received. There is simply no explanation for the applicant's failure to appear this morning.
In those circumstances, and given the deficiencies in the Application for an Order of Review to which I have referred, it is appropriate that I make an order dismissing the application with costs, and I do so.
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Hely. Associate:
Dated: 2 November 2001
No appearance by the applicant Solicitor for the Respondent: Ms A Nanson Date of Hearing: 26 October 2001 Date of Judgment: 26 October 2001
- AGLC
- Widouri v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1543
- Case
- [2001] FCA 1543
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue revolved around whether the Minister correctly applied the Migration Act 1958 and its regulations in evaluating Widouri's asylum application. Specifically, the court examined whether the Minister considered all relevant information and whether the decisions were rationally based on that information. Additionally, the court considered whether the Minister's actions demonstrated bias or an error of law that warranted judicial intervention.
The court held that the Minister's decisions were made in accordance with the law and the Migration Act. It found that the Minister had properly considered all relevant information and that the decisions were not unreasonable. The court also dismissed Widouri's claims of bias, finding no evidence to support such a contention. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the court ordered Widouri to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application be dismissed with costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: HELY J
Full text does not contain this section.