Wicklow and Wicklow and Anor (No. 3)

In the matter of Wicklow and Wicklow and Anor (No. 3), Justice Fowler of the Family Court of Australia considered an application concerning costs. The dispute involved parties identified as Wicklow and Wicklow and Anor.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the costs previously ordered on 12 November 2008 should be paid on an indemnity basis.

Justice Fowler determined that the costs should be paid on an indemnity basis. While the specific reasoning for this determination is not detailed in the provided text, the order itself signifies the Court's decision on the nature of the cost recovery.

Consequently, the Court ordered that the costs payable pursuant to its order of 12 November 2008 be paid on an indemnity basis.