Whitecross and Reilly (No 2)

In *Whitecross and Reilly (No 2)*, the father applied to the court on 13 April 2016. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates it involved family law proceedings concerning children, as an Independent Children’s Lawyer was involved and their costs were ordered. The decision was made by Cronin J.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the father's application filed on 13 April 2016 should be struck out. This implies the court considered whether the application was an abuse of process or otherwise without merit to warrant its dismissal.

Cronin J determined that the father's application should be struck out. The court ordered that the father pay the Independent Children’s Lawyer’s costs, fixed at $4700.