[2013] FWCA 3641 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Westminster School Inc
(AG2013/1233)
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL MAINTENANCE STAFF ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER STEEL | ADELAIDE, 6 JUNE 2013 |
Application for approval of the Westminster School Maintenance Staff Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Westminster School Maintenance Staff Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss. 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 13 June 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 February 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401666 PR537649>
- AGLC
- Westminster School Inc [2013] FWCA 3641
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3641
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission found that the agreement did not adequately address the procedural requirements for approval, as it did not contain a clause requiring the employer to provide the employees with a copy of the agreement. The Commission also found that the agreement did not provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, as it did not adequately address the issue of employee entitlements to paid leave. The Commission concluded that the agreement did not comply with the requirements of the Act, and therefore could not be approved.
The Commission ordered that the application for approval of the agreement be dismissed. The Commission did not make any orders regarding the terms and conditions of employment for the maintenance staff at Westminster School, as it found that the agreement did not provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions. The Commission did not make any orders regarding the procedural requirements for approval of the agreement, as it found that the agreement did not comply with those requirements. The Commission did not make any orders regarding the issue of employee entitlements to paid leave, as it found that the agreement did not adequately address that issue.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.