Western Bundjalung People v Attorney General of New South Wales
Case
•
[2017] FCA 992
•29 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Western Bundjalung People v Attorney General of New South Wales [2017] FCA 992
[2017] FCA 992
29 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Federal Court of Australia was tasked with determining the existence and extent of native title for the Western Bundjalung People over certain lands and waters in New South Wales. The legal issues before the Court involved the scope and content of the native title rights and interests, their relationship with existing rights and interests, and the applicability of certain statutory provisions. The Court was also required to consider the effect of prior interests and public works on the extinguishment of native title.
The Court found that native title existed for the Western Bundjalung People over the specified lands and waters, with certain areas of extinguishment due to public works and prior interests. The Court outlined the specific native title rights and interests, which included the right to enter, camp, hunt, fish, and engage in cultural activities, among others. The Court also detailed the relationship between these rights and interests and existing rights, such as mining and petroleum interests, water licences, and forestry permits. The Court clarified that while native title rights and interests existed, they were subject to the laws of the State of New South Wales and the Commonwealth, as well as traditional laws and customs of the native title holders.
The Court made several orders, including a determination of native title in favour of the Western Bundjalung People, specifying the extent of the native title area and the areas of extinguishment. The Court also directed that Ngullingah Jugun (Our Country) Aboriginal Corporation hold the native title in trust for the common law holders and perform certain functions. The Court set a deadline for the registration of an Indigenous Land Use Agreement and provided for further directions if the agreement was not registered within the specified timeframe.
The Court found that native title existed for the Western Bundjalung People over the specified lands and waters, with certain areas of extinguishment due to public works and prior interests. The Court outlined the specific native title rights and interests, which included the right to enter, camp, hunt, fish, and engage in cultural activities, among others. The Court also detailed the relationship between these rights and interests and existing rights, such as mining and petroleum interests, water licences, and forestry permits. The Court clarified that while native title rights and interests existed, they were subject to the laws of the State of New South Wales and the Commonwealth, as well as traditional laws and customs of the native title holders.
The Court made several orders, including a determination of native title in favour of the Western Bundjalung People, specifying the extent of the native title area and the areas of extinguishment. The Court also directed that Ngullingah Jugun (Our Country) Aboriginal Corporation hold the native title in trust for the common law holders and perform certain functions. The Court set a deadline for the registration of an Indigenous Land Use Agreement and provided for further directions if the agreement was not registered within the specified timeframe.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Indigenous Peoples & Native Title Law
Legal Concepts
-
Native Title
-
Native Title Holders
-
Aboriginal Land Council
-
Other Interests
-
Aboriginal Corporation Land
-
Reserves
-
Mining and Petroleum Interests
-
Water Interests
-
Fishing Interests
-
National Park Interests
-
Occupational Permits
-
Forestry Interests
-
Crown Lands Interests
-
Electricity and Energy Supply Interests
-
Local Government Interests
-
Licence Interest
-
Other interests generally
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
First Peoples of the Millewa-Mallee Native Title Claim Group v State of Victoria [2025] FCA 799
Cases Citing This Decision
108
McLennan on behalf of the Jangga People #3 v State of Queensland
[2023] FCAFC 191