Westbourne Grammar School Summary

[2014] FWCA 3864

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Westbourne Grammar School
(AG2014/1057)

WESTBOURNE GRAMMAR SCHOOL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2016

Educational services
COMMISSIONER BISSETT	MELBOURNE, 11 JUNE 2014

Application for approval of the Westbourne Grammar School Enterprise Agreement 2014-2016.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Westbourne Grammar School Enterprise Agreement 2014-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Westbourne Grammar School. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 June 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by Westbourne Grammar School for approval of an Enterprise Agreement. The school sought to finalise the terms and conditions of employment for its employees under the agreement, which was intended to cover the period from 2014 to 2016. The dispute arose because the employees' union contested the terms of the proposed agreement, leading to the application being brought before the Commission to determine whether it met the criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act.

The primary legal issues the Commission was required to address included whether the agreement was made in good faith, whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act. Furthermore, the Commission needed to assess if the agreement contained terms that were contrary to public policy or not genuinely agreed upon by the parties.

In its decision, the Commission first examined whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the parties. It found that while there were some issues with the negotiation process, the overall agreement was the result of genuine bargaining efforts. The Commission then assessed the terms of the agreement against the criteria of good faith and reasonableness. It concluded that most of the terms were fair and reasonable, although it made some adjustments to certain provisions to better align with these standards. The Commission also reviewed the procedural compliance and determined that the agreement largely adhered to the necessary requirements. Ultimately, the Commission approved the agreement with minor modifications, ensuring that it met all legal criteria for endorsement.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement with certain modifications, ensuring compliance with the Fair Work Act. The approved agreement was to take effect from the specified period and would govern the employment terms and conditions of the school's employees. The Commission's decision provided clarity on the acceptable terms and helped to finalise the employment relationship between the school and its employees.

Westbourne Grammar School

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established