WEST AUSTRALIAN SHALOM GROUP INC. and CITY OF SWAN
Case
•
[2018] WASAT 36
•25 MAY 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
WEST AUSTRALIAN SHALOM GROUP INC. and CITY OF SWAN [2018] WASAT 36
[2018] WASAT 36
25 MAY 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
West Australian Shalom Group Inc. sought approval from the City of Swan for a development application to construct a rehabilitation centre on their property. The centre aimed to conduct a five-stage rehabilitation program for men with serious drug or other addictions or other 'life-dominating' issues. The City of Swan objected to the proposed use of the site, contending that it did not fall within the permitted uses under the local planning scheme. The primary legal issues before the court were whether the site's use could be classified as 'Residential Building' or 'Community Purpose' under the local planning scheme, and if not, whether it constituted an innominate or unlisted use that could be approved.
The court found that the site's use did not fall under the 'Residential Building' category, as the participants' stay was not for the primary purpose of habitation. Instead, the primary purpose was the rehabilitation program. The court also held that the use did not qualify as 'Community Purpose', as the primary intent was not to provide educational, social, or recreational facilities for community benefit. The court concluded that the site's use was innominate or unlisted under the local planning scheme. The court considered the primary purpose of the site and found that it was not designed or adapted primarily for any of the permitted uses under the local planning scheme.
The court determined that the site's use could be approved as an innominate or unlisted use, given that it was not contrary to the planning scheme and did not conflict with any relevant policies or objectives. The court found that the rehabilitation program provided a significant community benefit by addressing serious drug or other addictions or other 'life-dominating' issues. The court also noted that the program was not a residential building, hospital, sanatorium, prison, hotel, motel, or residential school. The court concluded that the site's use was not prohibited and could be approved as an innominate or unlisted use.
The court ordered that the City of Swan approve the development application, subject to any necessary conditions or requirements. The court also noted that the applicant must comply with all relevant laws and regulations, including any conditions or requirements imposed by the City of Swan. The court held that the applicant's rehabilitation program provided a significant community benefit and did not conflict with any relevant policies or objectives under the local planning scheme.
The court found that the site's use did not fall under the 'Residential Building' category, as the participants' stay was not for the primary purpose of habitation. Instead, the primary purpose was the rehabilitation program. The court also held that the use did not qualify as 'Community Purpose', as the primary intent was not to provide educational, social, or recreational facilities for community benefit. The court concluded that the site's use was innominate or unlisted under the local planning scheme. The court considered the primary purpose of the site and found that it was not designed or adapted primarily for any of the permitted uses under the local planning scheme.
The court determined that the site's use could be approved as an innominate or unlisted use, given that it was not contrary to the planning scheme and did not conflict with any relevant policies or objectives. The court found that the rehabilitation program provided a significant community benefit by addressing serious drug or other addictions or other 'life-dominating' issues. The court also noted that the program was not a residential building, hospital, sanatorium, prison, hotel, motel, or residential school. The court concluded that the site's use was not prohibited and could be approved as an innominate or unlisted use.
The court ordered that the City of Swan approve the development application, subject to any necessary conditions or requirements. The court also noted that the applicant must comply with all relevant laws and regulations, including any conditions or requirements imposed by the City of Swan. The court held that the applicant's rehabilitation program provided a significant community benefit and did not conflict with any relevant policies or objectives under the local planning scheme.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Planning & Development Law
Legal Concepts
-
Adverse Possession
-
Community Purpose
-
IncidENTAL Use
-
Land Use Classification
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
WEST AUSTRALIAN SHALOM GROUP INC. and CITY OF JOONDALUP [2023] WASAT 63
Cases Citing This Decision
12
WEST AUSTRALIAN SHALOM GROUP INC. and CITY OF JOONDALUP
[2023] WASAT 63
NIELD and SHIRE OF SERPENTINEJARRAHDALE
[2021] WASAT 94
DAO JI ASSOCIATION and CITY OF GOSNELLS
[2020] WASAT 10
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
4
City of Swan v West Australian Shalom Group Inc
[2017] WASC 217
BOYD and TOWN OF VINCENT
[2007] WASAT 93
WEST AUSTRALIAN SHALOM GROUP INC and CITY OF SWAN
[2016] WASAT 41