Welton and Welton
Case
•
[2016] FCCA 3509
•4 April 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Welton and Welton [2016] FCCA 3509
[2016] FCCA 3509
4 April 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Welton and Welton*, heard by Judge Harman, the dispute concerned parenting arrangements for the parties' two children, X and Y. The orders made by the court addressed issues of parental responsibility, the children's living arrangements, and their time and communication with each parent.
The court was required to determine the interim parenting orders for the children, including their primary residence, the extent of their time with the non-resident parent, and the communication protocols between the parents and the children. Furthermore, the court addressed the need for parental involvement in the children's education and psychological care, and the process for resolving ongoing disputes.
Judge Harman ordered that the parents share equal parental responsibility for X and Y, with the children to live with their mother. The father was granted specific periods of time with the children during school holidays and regular telephone contact. Crucially, the court imposed restraints on both parents contacting the children except as permitted by the orders, with specific conditions for electronic communication. The court also directed the parents to attend a Child Inclusive Child Dispute Conference with a Family Consultant, who was requested to provide a report to the court. The orders also stipulated that both parents be listed as emergency contacts at the children's schools and have access to their educational and psychological reports, with restrictions on additional psychological or counselling attendance without mutual consent. The matter was adjourned for further directions, with liberty to restore the proceedings if a child was not returned to the mother's care by a specified date.
The court was required to determine the interim parenting orders for the children, including their primary residence, the extent of their time with the non-resident parent, and the communication protocols between the parents and the children. Furthermore, the court addressed the need for parental involvement in the children's education and psychological care, and the process for resolving ongoing disputes.
Judge Harman ordered that the parents share equal parental responsibility for X and Y, with the children to live with their mother. The father was granted specific periods of time with the children during school holidays and regular telephone contact. Crucially, the court imposed restraints on both parents contacting the children except as permitted by the orders, with specific conditions for electronic communication. The court also directed the parents to attend a Child Inclusive Child Dispute Conference with a Family Consultant, who was requested to provide a report to the court. The orders also stipulated that both parents be listed as emergency contacts at the children's schools and have access to their educational and psychological reports, with restrictions on additional psychological or counselling attendance without mutual consent. The matter was adjourned for further directions, with liberty to restore the proceedings if a child was not returned to the mother's care by a specified date.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Standing
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Welton and Welton [2016] FCCA 3509
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
3
Luxton v Vines
[1952] HCA 19
Deacon & Castle
[2013] FCCA 691
R & R: Children's Wishes
[2000] FamCA 43