| [2016] FWCA 4446 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Wellen Pty Ltd T/A Austcor Packaging
(AG2016/3304)
WELLEN PTY LTD - TRADING AS AUSTCOR PACKAGING ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2016
Graphic Arts | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 7 JULY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Wellen Pty Ltd - Trading as Austcor Packaging Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Wellen Pty Ltd - Trading as Austcor Packaging Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 7 July 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 14 July 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE419755 PR582405>
- AGLC
- Wellen Pty Ltd T/A Austcor Packaging [2016] FWCA 4446
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4446
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved the validity and fairness of the proposed agreement. The primary considerations were whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly concerning its coverage, the bargaining process, and its compliance with the ‘better off overall test’. This test ensures that the employees are not worse off financially under the new agreement compared to their previous conditions.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was valid and met all statutory requirements. It concluded that the bargaining process was genuine, the coverage was appropriate, and the agreement was likely to result in employees being better off overall. The commission was satisfied with the evidence provided, which demonstrated that the proposed agreement would provide fair and reasonable outcomes for both parties.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2016, subject to the terms and conditions set out in the decision. The approval was granted based on the evidence that the agreement met the legislative requirements and was fair and reasonable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.