Wellcom Group Limited, in the matter of Wellcom Group Limited (No 2)
Case
•
[2019] FCA 1872
•13 November 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Wellcom Group Limited, in the matter of Wellcom Group Limited (No 2) [2019] FCA 1872
[2019] FCA 1872
13 November 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this case, Wellcom Group Limited sought approval from the Federal Court for a scheme of arrangement with its members, excluding SIDCOM Pty Ltd. The scheme, which had gained substantial support from the members at a meeting held on 8 November 2019, was outlined in Annexure B to the court's orders made on 4 October 2019. The applicant aimed to obtain the court's approval to bind dissenting members under section 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), as well as an exemption from certain disclosure requirements under section 411(12) of the Act.
The court was tasked with determining whether the scheme of arrangement received sufficient support from the members to warrant court approval. Additionally, the court needed to decide whether the applicant should be exempt from certain disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act.
The court found that the scheme had garnered strong support from the members, with a significant majority in favour. The court also concluded that the applicant had demonstrated that the scheme was fair and reasonable to all members, including those who did not vote in favour of it. The court approved the scheme and granted the applicant's request for an exemption from specific disclosure requirements. The orders were made pursuant to section 411(4)(b) and 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and rule 39.34 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
The Federal Court approved the scheme of arrangement and granted the applicant an exemption from certain disclosure requirements. The orders were to be entered forthwith as per rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
The court was tasked with determining whether the scheme of arrangement received sufficient support from the members to warrant court approval. Additionally, the court needed to decide whether the applicant should be exempt from certain disclosure obligations under the Corporations Act.
The court found that the scheme had garnered strong support from the members, with a significant majority in favour. The court also concluded that the applicant had demonstrated that the scheme was fair and reasonable to all members, including those who did not vote in favour of it. The court approved the scheme and granted the applicant's request for an exemption from specific disclosure requirements. The orders were made pursuant to section 411(4)(b) and 411(12) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and rule 39.34 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
The Federal Court approved the scheme of arrangement and granted the applicant an exemption from certain disclosure requirements. The orders were to be entered forthwith as per rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Corporate Law & Governance
Legal Concepts
-
Corporate Governance
-
Scheme of Arrangement
-
Approval of Scheme
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
In the matter of MyDeal.com.au Limited [2022] NSWSC 1317
Cases Citing This Decision
6
In the matter of MyDeal.com.au Limited
[2022] NSWSC 1317
Re Vault Intelligence Ltd (No 2)
[2020] FCA 1504
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
1
Re Wellcom Group Limited
[2019] FCA 1655
Re Central Pacific Minerals NL
[2002] FCA 239
Re Signature Capital Investments Ltd (No 2)
[2016] FCA 385