| [2015] FWCA 501 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
CORRECTION TO DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Weatherford Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8312)
Oil and gas industry | |
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 27 JANUARY 2015 |
Weatherford Australia Onshore Employee Collective Agreement 2014 - correction to nominal expiry date.
[1] The Decision issued by the Fair Work Commission on 19 January 2015 (PR560253) is corrected by deleting paragraph [7] and inserting the following:
“[7] The nominal expiry date of this Agreement is 18 January 2019.”
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE412321 PR560458 >
- AGLC
- Weatherford Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 501
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 501
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and the principles of statutory interpretation to determine the appropriate course of action. It considered whether the error in the nominal expiry date was merely clerical or whether it had substantive consequences for the employees' rights and obligations under the agreement. The Commission also weighed the importance of maintaining consistency and fairness in the application of the agreement. Ultimately, the Commission found that the error was indeed clerical and did not impact the substantive rights of the parties. Therefore, the tribunal had the authority to correct the nominal expiry date to reflect the parties' true intentions as expressed in the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission ruled that it had the authority to correct the nominal expiry date in the Weatherford Australia Onshore Employee Collective Agreement 2014, finding that the error was clerical and did not alter the substantive rights of the parties. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that agreements accurately reflect the intentions of the parties involved. As a result, the tribunal made the necessary correction to the nominal expiry date, ensuring that the agreement would be applied consistently and fairly moving forward. This decision provided clarity on the scope of the tribunal's powers in correcting clerical errors in collective agreements and reinforced the principle of upholding the true intentions of the parties.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.