Waverley Council v Bobolas

Case [2010] NSWLEC 157



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Waverley Council v Bobolas [2010] NSWLEC 157
PARTIES:

APPLICANT:
Waverley Council

FIRST RESPONDENT:
Mary Bobolas by her Tutor the NSW Trustee and Guardian

SECOND RESPONDENT:
Elena Bobolas

THIRD RESPONDENT:
Liana Bobolas
FILE NUMBER(S): 40916 of 2006
CORAM: Biscoe J
KEY ISSUES: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE :- adjournment of proceedings to enable formalisation of in principle settlement between applicant and statutory financial manager of respondent under legal incapacity and to obtain Court's approval of the settlement under s 76 Civil Procedure Act 2005
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 76
DATES OF HEARING: 18 August 2010
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 18 August 2010
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT:
Mr M Staunton, barrister
SOLICITORS
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie

RESPONDENTS:
Ms E Bobolas, in person
SOLICITORS
n/a


JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      BISCOE J

      17 August 2010

      40916 of 2006

      WAVERLEY COUNCIL v BOBOLAS & ORS

      EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT

1 HIS HONOUR: In these Class 4 civil enforcement proceedings the applicant, Waverley Council, has moved for an order that the three respondents pay the council’s costs of the proceedings. The notice of motion was before the Court on 30 June 2010 when it was stood over to today because of pending settlement discussions between the council and the NSW Trustee and Guardian which is the statutory financial manager of the first respondent, Mary Bobolas, who is under legal incapacity. The second and third respondents are her daughters. They all reside at the subject property at 19 Boonara Avenue, Bondi Beach. The first and second respondents but not the third respondent are present in court this morning.

2 The council and the NSW Trustee and Guardian have reached an in principle settlement agreement which resolves outstanding matters between the council and the first respondent not only in these proceedings but in a number of other proceedings in this and other courts since 2005 relating to the clearing of rubbish at the subject property. The agreement is that the council will be paid a sum of money in full satisfaction of all outstanding matters between it and the first respondent in relation to legal and other costs which the council has incurred since 2005 in those various proceedings. The various proceedings and the council’s estimate of the related legal and other costs are listed in Exhibit B. The council seeks an adjournment of its notice of motion for a reasonable period to permit the in principle agreement to be formalised in a deed and to seek the Court’s approval of the settlement.

3 It will be necessary for the council to obtain the Court’s approval of the settlement because the first respondent is under legal incapacity, s 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 applies, and s 76(3) provides that except with the approval of the court there may not be any compromise or settlement of any proceedings to which that section applies as regards a claim made against a person under legal incapacity.

4 If the court approves the settlement, the council will not press for a costs order against the second and third respondents.

5 The second respondent, Ms E Bobolas, has indicated, as I understand it, an objection to the proposed settlement. That need not be addressed on this occasion which is concerned with the procedural advancement of the matter.

6 The orders of the Court are as follows:


      1. The proceedings are adjourned to 31 August 2010 for the purpose of determining whether the Court should approve a settlement between the applicant council and the NSW Trustee and Guardian as financial manager of the estate of the first respondent and for the purpose of disposition of the council’s notice of motion of 22 June 2009.
      2. Any affidavits to be relied on by the council or the NSW Trustee and Guardian are to be filed and served by 6.00 pm on 25 August 2010.
      3. Service on the second and third respondents of any such affidavits may be effected by placing them in the mailbox at 19 Boonara Avenue, Bondi Beach, or if no mailbox is available by affixing them to the front fence.
      4. Any affidavits by the second and third respondents are to be filed and served by 10 am on 30 August 2010.
      5. Liberty to apply on one days’ notice.
      6. The costs of today are reserved.
Details
AGLC
Waverley Council v Bobolas [2010] NSWLEC 157
Case
[2010] NSWLEC 157
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Waverley Council v Bobolas, the applicant, Waverley Council, sought an order for the respondents, Mary Bobolas and her two daughters, to pay the council’s costs of the proceedings. The first respondent, Mary Bobolas, is under legal incapacity and her statutory financial manager is the NSW Trustee and Guardian. The case was before the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, presided over by Biscoe J. The central legal issue before the court was whether to adjourn the proceedings to allow for the formalisation of an in principle settlement agreement between the council and the NSW Trustee and Guardian, and to obtain the court's approval of the settlement under section 76 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.

The court considered that the council and the NSW Trustee and Guardian had reached an in principle settlement agreement, which would resolve outstanding matters between them in several proceedings since 2005. The agreement stipulated that the council would be paid a sum of money in full satisfaction of all outstanding matters between it and the first respondent in relation to legal and other costs incurred since 2005. The council sought an adjournment of its notice of motion for a reasonable period to formalise the agreement in a deed and to seek the court’s approval of the settlement. Given that the first respondent is under legal incapacity, the court's approval was necessary under section 76(3) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, which provides that except with the approval of the court, there may not be any compromise or settlement of any proceedings to which that section applies as regards a claim made against a person under legal incapacity.

The court granted the adjournment and outlined the procedural steps for the formalisation of the settlement agreement. The proceedings were adjourned to 31 August 2010 to determine whether the court should approve the settlement between the applicant council and the NSW Trustee and Guardian. The court also set deadlines for the filing and service of affidavits and specified the method of service on the second and third respondents. Additionally, the court reserved its decision on the costs of the hearing.

The orders of the court were as follows: the proceedings were adjourned to 31 August 2010 for the purpose of determining whether the court should approve a settlement between the applicant council and the NSW Trustee and Guardian, as well as for the disposition of the council’s notice of motion of 22 June 2009. Affidavits to be relied on by the council or the NSW Trustee and Guardian were to be filed and served by 6.00 pm on 25 August 2010, and service on the second and third respondents could be effected by placing the affidavits in the mailbox at 19 Boonara Avenue, Bondi Beach, or by affixing them to the front fence if no mailbox was available. Any affidavits by the second and third respondents were to be filed and served by 10 am on 30 August 2010. The court also granted liberty to apply on one day’s notice and reserved the decision on the costs of the hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.