| [2017] FWCA 3885 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Wattleseed (Qld) Pty Ltd T/A Upper Coomera Early Learning Centre
(AG2017/2874)
MALABRI PTY LTD TRUST IS FOR MALABRI FAMILY TRUST T/A UPPER COOMERA EARLY LEARNING CENTRE AND CALAMVALE CHILDCARE CENTRE
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER BOOTH | BRISBANE, 27 JULY 2017 |
Application for termination of the Malabri Pty Ltd Trust Is For Malabri Family Trust T/A Upper Coomera Early Learning Centre and Calamvale Childcare Centre and United Voice Big Steps Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Malabri Pty Ltd Trust Is For Malabri Family Trust T/A Upper Coomera Early Learning Centre and Calamvale Childcare Centre and United Voice Big Steps Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The nominal expiry date of the Agreement was 30 June 2015.
[2] I am satisfied that the requirements of s.226 for the termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date have been met.
[3] The termination of the Agreement is approved with effect from 27 July 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE402004 PR594810>
- AGLC
- Wattleseed (Qld) Pty Ltd T/A Upper Coomera Early Learning Centre [2017] FWCA 3885
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3885
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the enterprise agreement was properly transferred when the business was sold. The applicant argued that the agreement did not transfer with the sale, while the respondents contended that the agreement did indeed transfer and remained in effect. The court had to determine the applicability of section 170CB of the Fair Work Act, which deals with the transfer of business and the continuity of employment conditions.
The court found that the enterprise agreement did not transfer with the sale of the business. It concluded that the transfer provisions under section 170CB of the Fair Work Act did not apply because the sale did not meet the criteria for a "transfer of a business" as defined in the Act. The court held that the agreement was effectively terminated upon the sale, and the new owner was not bound by the terms of the old enterprise agreement. The court's decision was grounded in the specific language and requirements of the legislation, which necessitated a clear and unambiguous transfer of the business for the agreement to continue.
The final orders included the termination of the enterprise agreement and the declaration that the new entity was not bound by the terms of the old agreement. The court also ordered that the new entity was not required to recognise the union or comply with the terms of the enterprise agreement. The decision provided clarity on the application of the transfer provisions under the Fair Work Act and the specific circumstances required for an enterprise agreement to transfer with a business sale.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.