Wattel and Evans
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 411
•12 May 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Wattel and Evans [2010] FamCA 411
[2010] FamCA 411
12 May 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties in this matter were Wattel and Evans, with Murphy J presiding in the Family Court of Australia. The dispute concerned parenting arrangements for a child, T, born in August 2002. The proceedings concluded by consent, with the court making orders reflecting the agreement reached between the parties.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of parenting orders concerning the child's residence, time spent with each parent, and various ancillary matters. These included provisions for changeovers, restrictions on the father's ability to issue further proceedings or contact certain agencies, and restraints on the father's contact with the mother and other individuals. The orders also addressed the child's education, medical care, and communication between the parents.
Murphy J made orders by consent, discharging all extant orders and establishing that the child would live with the mother. The father was granted specific time with the child during school terms and holidays, with detailed provisions for changeovers. Crucially, the father was restrained from issuing further proceedings concerning the child for a period and from contacting certain agencies. He was also restrained from contacting the mother, R Evans, or his family, and from allowing the child to contact PW. The orders further stipulated arrangements for the child's schooling and medical care, and outlined communication protocols between the parents, including limitations on email correspondence. The Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged and authorised to serve copies of the orders on relevant authorities.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of parenting orders concerning the child's residence, time spent with each parent, and various ancillary matters. These included provisions for changeovers, restrictions on the father's ability to issue further proceedings or contact certain agencies, and restraints on the father's contact with the mother and other individuals. The orders also addressed the child's education, medical care, and communication between the parents.
Murphy J made orders by consent, discharging all extant orders and establishing that the child would live with the mother. The father was granted specific time with the child during school terms and holidays, with detailed provisions for changeovers. Crucially, the father was restrained from issuing further proceedings concerning the child for a period and from contacting certain agencies. He was also restrained from contacting the mother, R Evans, or his family, and from allowing the child to contact PW. The orders further stipulated arrangements for the child's schooling and medical care, and outlined communication protocols between the parents, including limitations on email correspondence. The Independent Children's Lawyer was discharged and authorised to serve copies of the orders on relevant authorities.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Injunction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Natural Justice
-
Remedies
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Wattel and Evans [2010] FamCA 411
Most Recent Citation
Environment Protection Authority v CollexPty Ltd [2001] NSWLEC 177
Cases Citing This Decision
9
Maurice & Barry
[2010] FamCA 687
R v Yu
[2019] NSWDC 904
Durante, Kurt Russell v The Queen
[2009] NSWDC 157
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
1
Dennison & Wang
[2010] FamCAFC 182
Dennison & Wang
[2010] FamCAFC 182
Harris v Caladine
[1991] HCA 9