| [2019] FWCA 3984 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Waterway Constructions Pty Ltd T/A Waterway Constructions
(AG2018/7343)
WATERWAY CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT KOVACIC | CANBERRA, 7 JUNE 2019 |
Application for approval of the Waterway Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Waterway Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Waterway Constructions Pty Ltd T/A Waterway Constructions. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] Subject to concerns that have been addressed by way of undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted undertakings from the employer. In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertakings are attached to this decision.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 June 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 June 2022.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE503825 PR709161>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Waterway Constructions Pty Ltd T/A Waterway Constructions [2019] FWCA 3984
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 3984
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central issue before the FWC was whether the Enterprise Agreement was genuinely an agreement between the parties. The CFMEU argued that the agreement was not genuinely negotiated, as it was based on a template provided by the employer and contained terms that were not subject to negotiation. The FWC had to consider the evidence presented by both parties to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it met the requirements of the Act. This included examining the process of negotiation, the content of the agreement, and the extent to which the agreement was made in good faith.
The FWC found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated, despite the employer providing a template. The FWC noted that while the employer had provided a template, the parties had still engaged in a negotiation process, with the union making submissions and proposals, and the employer responding to these. The FWC concluded that the agreement contained terms that were the product of genuine negotiation and that the process was conducted in good faith. The FWC further found that the agreement met all the requirements of the Act, including the provisions for employee engagement, and was therefore approved.
The FWC approved the Waterway Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement, finding that it was genuinely negotiated and met all the requirements of the Act. The CFMEU's opposition to the application was dismissed, and the agreement was registered as a modern award.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.