| [2019] FWCA 614 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Waterside Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2018/7115)
WATERSIDE ENGINEERING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 4 FEBRUARY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Waterside Engineering Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Waterside Engineering Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Waterside Engineering Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
• Clause 24.4.2 – Severance Payment
• Clause 28.8 – Annual Leave
However, noting clause 3.4 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 February 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE501579 PR704500>
- AGLC
- Waterside Engineering Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 614
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 614
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided for a fair and efficient system of determining wages and other conditions of employment and whether it included a dispute resolution process. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement was free from any unlawful content, particularly in relation to any discrimination or adverse action provisions.
In examining the agreement, the Commission assessed its provisions against the legislative framework. It determined that the agreement established a fair and efficient system for determining wages and other employment conditions. The Commission was satisfied that the proposed dispute resolution process was adequate and that there were no unlawful provisions within the agreement. Consequently, the Commission approved the Waterside Engineering Enterprise Agreement 2018, finding it to be compliant with the statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.