[2014] FWCA 4730 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Warners Bay Early Learning and Care Centre Inc
(AG2014/1737)
WARNERS BAY EARLY LEARNING AND CARE CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Children’s services | |
COMMISSIONER MCKENNA | SYDNEY, 15 JULY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Warners Bay Early Learning and Care Centre Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Warners Bay Early Learning and Care Centre Enterprise Agreement (“the Agreement”). The application has been made by Warners Bay Early Learning and Care Centre Inc (“the applicant”) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval has been met. The applicant has provided a written undertaking addressing a discrete matter. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision and marked “Annexure A”. I note that, under s.191 of the Act, the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. Further, I also note, as the Agreement does not contain a complying consultation term, the model consultation term is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia and United Voice NSW Branch concur with the undertaking and have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date is 30 June 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE409092 PR553139>
- AGLC
- Warners Bay Early Learning and Care Centre Inc [2014] FWCA 4730
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4730
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether the agreement provided for a safety net of minimum entitlements and whether it had been fairly negotiated. The Commission examined the agreement clause by clause, considering the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The Commission found that the agreement did provide for a safety net of minimum entitlements, but that it had not been fairly negotiated. The Commission found that the employer had not provided the union with sufficient information to allow for meaningful negotiation, and that the union had not been given adequate opportunity to consult with its members about the agreement.
The Commission did not approve the agreement, but allowed the parties to make further submissions about the fairness of the negotiation process. The Commission found that the employer had not engaged in good faith negotiations with the union, and that the union had not been given adequate opportunity to consult with its members. The Commission ordered that the agreement be referred back to the parties for further negotiation, with specific directions as to the information that must be provided and the consultation that must take place. The Commission also ordered that the employer pay the union's costs of the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.