Ward, Leonard Edward v Williams, Hughie

Case [1984] FCA 60


P

I. '

BETWEEN :

LEONARD

EDIJARD

bJARD,

GREGORY JOHN ' M Y ,

LAWRENCE JOHN TURNER, BRIAN STUART LEE,

LESLIE KONALD LEE, ROY LESLIE LINCOLW,

DOiTALi)

LYNALD

BARDEN, RONALD JAMS POTTER

and JOED CHARLES

PENEIALLURICK

A p p l i c a n t s

-

"D :

BUGHIE

WILLIAMS

, AT>LAR

PIcPAUL

, CLARENCE

-

ROHWEDER, ' GREGORY NEWTON, HENRY ASYLIN ,

STUART CEOSBY, DAVID PEARCE, KERVYN

:(ENDALL,

PETER THOXSON a n m 1 T S P E T E X

Responden t s

O R D E R

!

JUDGE ILPi?<ING ORDZR:

-

Neaves

J .

-

DATE 3F OXDDCR:

78 March

1 9 8 4

WHERE WiEE :

Canberra

I

I T 1s FEPGZBY ORDERED

- that Hughie Nilliams, Allan NcPau i ,

Clarecce

Rohweder ,

Gregory

Newton,

Henry

A s p l i n ,

S t u a r t

Crosby ,

Davidi P e a r c e ,

Mervyn

: < e n d a l l , P e t e r

Thornson

and

J o h n H i n s p e t e r

( " t h e

r e s p o n d e n t s " )

appear

before

the

F e d e r a l Court o f Austral ia

at Brisbane Ln the S t a t e of

i

Q u e e n s l a n d on a clate

ancl

at

a

time

to be n o t i f i e d t o the

p a r t 1 e . s t o

show cause why clrdcrs

s h o u l d not be made

undei-

s e c t l o n 141

ot

{:he

C c n c l l i a t l o n a n d A r b i t r a t i o n

Act

1904

g i v i n g

d l r e c t j o n s

t h a t

t h e r e s p o n d e n t s o b s e r v e r u l e r .

l.

2 2 , 3 0 , 22. 33 and 47 of

the

rules

of

the Transport

_ _

, : .orksrs'

L2ion of Aus t r a l i a and why

orders shollld no t

be made

i n terms of

sub-paragraphs

1 t o 11

inc lus ive o f

paragraph A of the appl ica t ion da ted

19 March 1984

f i l e d h e r e i n

on

behalf

o f Leonard Edvard

Ward,

Gregory

John Ray, Lawrence John Turner, Brian Stuart Lee, Leslie

Ronald Lee, Roy Lesl ie Lincoln,

Donald Lynald Barclen,

Ronald

Jarnes

P o t t e r

and

John Penhalluriclc ("the applicants")

AND

I T I S HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED

that pending the hear ing

and

determination

of

t h i s m a t t e r o r u n t i l f u r t h e r o r d e r

1

the respondents be restrained from giving effect

t

o

so

much

o f

t he r e so lu t ion

o f t h e Committee

of Management of

t h e Queensland Eranch

of

the Transport Workers'

Union of

Aus t r a l i a ca r r i ed

on

15 March

19Sh as p rov ides tha t

-

the Brisbane

Sub-B-ranch Secretary Eughie

Wllliams he appointed as a Branch Organizer;

a l l Branch Organizers performing

d u t y

i n

the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

a rea r epor t ve rba l ly

and

i n

wri t ing to the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

Secre ta ry on

a l l m a t t e r s , i n c l u d i n g

all

disputes ;

the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

Secre ta ry hax7e

f r e e

a c c e s s

t o

all sec t ions of t h e

,

,

Queensland Eranch Offices

and.

complete

access

to correspondence

and

documents

of t h e t h i s o rde r sha l l no t p reven t

Queensland Branch pro-qided, that.

the

Brisbane

Sub-Rranch

Secre ta ry havmg access to

the

membership

records of the Queensland

Branch r e l a t l n g t o the members

of

the

Brisbane

Sub-Branch;

and

the Queensland Branch

meke

a v a i l a b l e t o

the

Brisbzne

Sub-Sranch

Secretary

staff

a t p r e s e n t

employed by

the Queensland

Branch and

pelrEorming

duty l n t h e

Queensland

Granch

OfEices.

L .

&NE ZT 1s ?!!REBY

FURTHER ORDERED thar the costs of the

2ppliserLon be reserved.

I

3 .

.

BETWEEN :

A p p l i c a n t s

1

-

ALUD :

HUGHIE WILLIANS, ALLAN

McPAUL,

CLARENCE

ROHWEDER, GREGORY NEVTON , HENRY ASPLIN,

STUART CROSEY, DAVID PEARCE, MEKVYN

KENDALL,

PETER

THOHSOX

and JOHN E-IJNSPETER

Respondents

coRA1: :

Neaves J .

28 PIarch 1984

-

DATE :

REASONS

FOR

JUDGI4ENT

T h i s i s an application by Leonard

Edward Ward,

Gregory

John

Ray,

La r r r ence John Turne r ,

Brian

S t u a r t L e e ,

L e s l i e P,onald

L e e ,

Roy

L e s h e L i n c o l n , D o n a l d L y n a l d

Barden , Ronald

James

P o t r e r

and

John

Charles

P e n h a l l u r i c k

("the

a p p l l c a n t s " )

€or

a

r u l e

n i s i

c a l l l n g u p o n H u g h i e

I J i l l i a rns , Allan ?IcPaul,

Clarence

Rohweder ,

Gregory Newton,

Henry Asp l in , S tua r t Crosby , Dav id Pea rce , P i e rvyn Kenda l l . ,

1.

I

?e te r

Thozson

and John Hinspeter

("the

respondents")

to

shcx c 2 s s why orders shoulci nor

be made under sect ion

141

of

t he Conc i l i a t ion

and

Arb i t r a t ion Act

1 9 0 4

("the Act")

giving directions

for the performance or observance

by

the

rcspondents

of

c e r t a i n r u l e s

of

the Transport Workers'

Union of Australia

("the

Union").

The

app l i can t s

a l so

seek iEterim orders pending the hearing

of

t h e rule -

nis i .

The Union

i s an

organiza t ion reg is te red pursuant

t o t h e Act.

There 1 s a branch oE t h e Union

knotm

a s t h e

Queensland

Branch.

That

branrh

i s

d iv ided

in to n ine

sub-

branches,

ose o f those sub-branches being

knovm as the

Brisbane

Sub-Branch.

Subject

to

the provis ions

of

the A c t ,

t h e supreme

cont ro l

of

t h e

Union

i s v e s t e d i n

a

Federal Council con-

s t i t u t e d by

a

representat ive or representat ives f rom each

branch (called Federal

Councillors)

and

the Fedexal

Secretary

and the Federal Counci l e lects

Ass is tan t

Federa

l

Secre ta ry

( sub- ru le

5 ( a ) ) .

The

a

Federal Comnittee

of

Management

( sub- ru le 5(c)

and

r u l e 2 3 ) .

Each branch

e lec ts

a Branch

Cormnlttee of Management

cons is t ing o f a

Branch P res iden t ,

Branch Vice-Yresident, Branch Secretary,

two

Trus tees

and

not less than 7 and not more than 11 Committeemen

(sub-

r u l e 5 ( g ) and

r u l e 3 0 ) .

The President,

Vice

President

,

Secre ta ry

and

Trus tees a re e lec ted

by

a

b a l l o t

o f

t h e ~ r h o l e

o f

t h e members

of

the branch

who

are

e l i g i b l e t o v o t e .

L

I!

I n t h e

czss of

the

Queensland

Branch,

the

Committeemen

a r e -.lec:ed

by

a b a l l o t of the members

i n each sub-branch

who

a r e e l i g i b l e t o v o t e

on the iol lowing basis

-

Bris-

I

bane 4 ; Rockhampton 1; Wide

Bay

1; Toovoomba, Warwick and

Roma

1; Ipswich and Ringaroy

1 , and Northern Queensland

l

(sub-ru le 30(b) ) .

The

Branch

Committee

of

Management

of

che Queensland Branch,

therefore, consists of

1 4 members.

Each o f t he app l i can t s

i s a member

o f t he

Union.

A t

e l ec t ions r ecen t ly he ld fo r t he

Queensland Branch

( the

r e s u l t s o f

which were declared

on

9 March

1 9 8 4 ) , Mr.

Ward

was elected

Branch

Secrecary.

The

f u l l t i t l e

o f

h is

o f f i c e

IS “Secretary - Treasurer - Federal Committee of Manageaent -

Federal Council

Representative“ but,

for convenience,

I

shall

r e f e r t o t h e o f f i c e

as

t h a t

of

Branch Secretary.

Messrs. Ray, Turner, B.S . Lee, L.R. Lee and Lincoln v7ere

e lec ted %ranch

Organizers

to carry out dut ies

i n

the

Brisbane Sub-Branch area or as directed

by

the Branch

Secre ta ry .

Mr.

Barden was

elected Branch Organizer

to

car ry out du t ies in the Ipswich

Sub-Branch

a r e a o r

as

d i r ec t ed by

t h e

Branch

Secretary.

M r .

P o t t e r

was

e lec t ed

zd

Branch

Trustee.

Mr. PenhaL1uz)ick does

not

hold

any

o f f i c e

i n the

Queensland

Branch.

O f

t he

app l i can t s , on ly

Messrs. Vard,

Xarden

and

Po t t e r a r e

members

of

the

Branch

Committee o E Manegement .

Of

the respondents ,

Nr, Wllliams, who previous ly

he ld o f f i ce

as

Branch Secretary,

was

defeated

i n t h e e l e c t i o n

I .

f o r :ht pos i t i on by Mr.

Ward.

Mr.

1-Jilliams r r a s , however,

e lecssd Srisbane

Sub-Branch

Secre ta ry ,

an honorary posi t ion

which h s had

held before

the elect ion. There

i s

evidence

that each of the other respondents

i s

a

member

o f t h e

I

Branch Committee of

Management

though

that evidence does

no t e s t ab l i sh

what

pos i t i on Mr.

Crosby holds which results

i n him being a member o f t ha t

committee.

On

15 March 1984 t h e Branch Committee

o f Manage-

ment,

by

a

major i ty of

8

v o t e s t o

5 ,

c a r r i e d a

r e s o l u t i o n

i n t h e f o l l o w i n g

terms

-

"That

i n view of the almost total change of

Organisers in the Br isbane

Sub-Branch and

the

considerable lack of experience

by

t h e newly-

e lec ted Organisers ,

and

tak ing in to cons idera t ion

t h e d e t r i m e n t a l e f f e c t t h i s

will

have on

the rank

and

f i l e members,

pa r t i cu la r ly in the Br i sbane

Sub-Branch, t h i s BRANCH COMMiTTEE OF WINAGEPENT

DETEPJUNES -THAT -

The

Branch

s h a l l make

ava l lab le

t o the Brisbane

Sub-Branch Secretary, IIughie Williams

, Room

twenty-one

( 2 1 ) ,

F i r s t

Floor , Trades Hal l ,

Brisbane, for the purpose

of

conducting the

business, of the

Brlsbane sub-Branch.

Room

twenty-one

(21) w i l l a l so be u t i l i s e d

for

the

purpose

of

the

Brisbane

Sub-Branch

Executive Pketings.

Room Twenty-one

( 2 1 ) w i l l be suppl ied with

a

Committee

table for the conduct

oE

t h e

Exec-

u t i v e

Sub-Branch Meetings, Office desk,

telephone,

and all necessary office equlpmenc

and

f u r n i t u r e t o

conducr

the

administratlon

and

business of

the

Brisbane

Sub-Branch.

The

Branch Secretary shal l

make

a v a i l a b l e t o

the

Brisbane

Sub-Branch,

the

necessary

meeting

rooms t o conduct

the

Branch

monthly

General

Meetings

t h a t a r e h e l d

on

the

first Friday of

each month,

and any other such meetings

that

may

be necessary to

be convened

T l i t h i n the

Brisbane

Sub-Branch.

The

Erisbane

Sub-Branch

Sec re t a ry sha l l have

f z z z x c e s s t o a l l

sections of

the

Queensland

E z a z h

Off ices , a lso the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

S z c r e t a r y s h a l l

have ccmplete access

to

a l l

correspondence and documents t h a t may be re-

qu i r ed to ca r ry

out

his necessary

d u t i e s .

The

Brisbane Sub-Branch Secretary

i s

au thor i sed

to dea l d i r ec t w i th the Un ion ' s So l i c i to r s

-

I

McCrossan

ti

Douglas

-

on

a l l m a t t e r s p e r t a i n i n g

to the Br i sbane

Sub-Branch and

i t s members,

provided that

a l l cos ts incur red

are

au thor i sed

by t h e Branch Conmittee

o f Management.

All

Brisbane Sub-Branch Organisers

shall

r e p o r t

ve rba l ly

and

i n w r i t i n g

tc

the Br isbane

Sub-

Branch Secretary on

a l l matters,

inc luding a l l

d isputes .

The Brisbane

Sub-Branch

Secretary

will

n o t i f y t h e

Branch Secretary

of

a l l t hese

mat te rs .

The

Brisbane Sub-Branch Secretary shall be

Co-

ordinator and

Minuce

Secre ta ry o f

the Transpor t

Workers'

Union

Safe ty

Committee,

and

t h e Trans-

por t Workers Union

- TUTA Trade Union

Tra in ing

Committee.

The

Sub-Branch

Sec re t a ry sha l l

call t h e above

Meetings

as

deemed necessary.

He

sha l l

fo rward

the copies of

a l l minutes to

the

Branch

Secre ta ry .

The

Brisbane Sub-Branch Secretary shall be

com-

p e t e n t t o

make

press statements on

a l l m a t n e r s

p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e d u t i e s a s o u t l i n e d .

The

Branch

sha l l con t inue to

lnake

a v a i l a b l e t o

the 3 r i sbane

Sub-Branch

Secre ta ry any

necessary

o f f i ce s t aEf

which

t r i l l

a t l e a s t c o n s i s t o f

a

Stenographer

ar,d

Clerk/Typis t for the purpose

of a t tending

t o

correspondence, membership

records ,

and

any

other purpose necessary to

administer the Brisbane

Sub-Branch.

The

S t a f f ,

as mentioned, shal l

be

immediately responsible

to

the

Br i sbane

Sub-Branch

Secretary.

A l l

correspondence

to the Brisbane Sub-Branch shall

immediately be

forwarded

t o the Brisbane

Sub-

Branch

Secretary

f o r h i s

a tnen t ion

acd a c t i o n .

, ,

The

Branch

s h a l l make

avaihbl -e a

te lephone a t

the res idence

and

a t t he oEf i ce

o f

the Brisbane

Sub-Branch Secre ta ry , and shall pay all Union

c a l l s and

the r en t

SI such telephones.

5 .

-1

L E

Sranch sha l l cont inue to

make

a v a i l a b l e

to

=he

Brisbane Sub-Branch Secretary

the

.-.

t.rarLci Notor Vehicle, Ford, Registration

No.

7450xi,

and

s h a l l

pay

fo r t he fue l and

mainrenance

costs.

This

Branch

Committee

of

tlanagement

f u r t h e r

determines

that

in pursuance to Rule

3 0 ,

Che

Brisbane

Sub

Branch Secretary Hughie John

Nilliams be appointed as

a Branch Orga?'

L I s e r .

He

s h a l l be

domiciled i n Brisbane and carry

out organis ing

duties

i n a l l p a r t s o f

t h e

Brisbane

Sub-Branch.

He

s h a l l

a s s i s t

in

a l l

o ther mat te rs re levant to the Branch .

The

Organ i se r , hav ing r ega rd fo r a l l o the r

r e spons ib i l i t i e s , e .g . Br i sbane

Silb-Eranch

Secre ta ry

and

all

o the r du t i e s a s p rev ious ly

o u t l i n e d , s h a l l

be

paid

a

s a l a r y

and allowance

equa l t o

that

pa id to the

Branch

I n d u s t r i a l

Research Officer as detei-mined

by

t h e

Branch

Committee of Management.

He

s h a l l

be

e n t i t l e d

t o

r e t a i n a l l a c c r u e d

Annual Leave, Sick Leave and

Long

Serv

ice

Leave

and he

sha l l cont inue

EO

a c c r u e a l l

such leave

i n accordance with the

Rules and

Pol icy of

t h e Union.

The Eranch Secretary will ensure that

izhe

necessa ry Cer t i f l ca t e s

oE

Author i t i e s a re

immediately supplied

to a l l Organisers and

Off icers , whether e lected or appointed.

He xi11 t ake up

h l s du t ies

as above, com-

mencing on Friday, 16 th March,

1984. "

The

app l i can t ' s con tec t ion

i s that

in ca r ry ing

t h i s r e s o l u t i o n t h e

Branch Committee

of Management

was

ac t ing

in

breach

of

the

ru

les

of

the

Union.

The a-ctack

upon

t h e r e s o l u t i o n

i s p u t

i n

two trays.

F i r s t , it i s

sa id tha t t he r e so lu t ion con ta ins s ign i f i can t pa r t s

which

a re con t r a ry to the ru l e s

and

t h a t

i t s

p rov i s ions a re

so

inter locked

that

,

conceding

that

sone

p a r t s of

i t

a r e

cons is ten t

~ r i t - h

the rules ,

those par

ts

cannot

be severed

so

t h a t

t h e

whole

r e s o l u t i o n

f a l l s .

A l t e r n a t i v e l y

i t

i s

6 .

i

se id

t l x t s p e c i f i c p a r t s

of

the resolution should be

s e t

asit%

as

be ing con t r a ry to the ru l e s .

I

The

cons idera t ions re levant to the ques t ion

whether

a

r u l e

n i s i -should

be

g r a n t e d

d i f f e r from those

relevant

t o t h e g r a n t ,

assuming

a

r u l e i s t o i s s u e ,

of

in te r im re l ie f pending the f ina l de te rmina t ion of the

i s sues .

The former

question

depends

upon

the

appl icants

s a t i s f y i n g

the

Court that there

i s

an arguable issue or

a rguable i ssues in d ispute be tween the par t ies

i n

r e l a t i o n

,

to vh ich the app l i can t s

are

ent i t led

t o have

an

opportunity

t o p r e s e n t

argument

and

obta in a

decision of the Court:

see Geneff v. Pe tersen (1980) 4 9 F.L.R.

64 .

The appl icants

concede

t h a t ,

t o o b t a i n

i n t e r i m r e l i e f ,

t h e y

must

show

t h a t t h e r e

i s

a

probab i l i t y tha t t he app l l ca t ion

??ill

succeed

a t t h e f i n a l h e a r i n g , i f t h e e v i d e n c e r e m a l n s t h e

same:

Beecham Group L t d . v .

Er l s to l

Labora tor ies

P t y .

L t d .

(19SG) 118 C.L.R. 618:

but

see

The

Commonwealth

of Austl-alla

v. John

Fairfax

&

Sons L t d .

(1980) 1 4 7 C .L .R .

39

a t p.

49

and

The

Axstralian Coarse Grain Pool Pty.

L t d .

v.

The

Barlev

Marketing

Board

of

Queensland

(1952)

57

A . L . J . R .

425.

The

appl ica t ion for the gran t

of

a r u l e n l s l

was

not made -

ex pa r t e a s Order

4 ,

sub-rule

15(3)

of

t h e r u l e s

of

t h i s

Court permit but

upon

not ice to the respondents .

The

appl lca t ion i s supported by

an a f f i d a v i t sworn by Mr.

Ward and

upon

which

he

17as cross-examined.

Oral evldence

was

given for the respondents

by Mr.

Hinspeter and by

7

:.I~SS

?L.?.

Johnson,

an

employee

of

the Queensland Branch

of t>e Znion.

The respondents

oppose

the naking of

a

r u l e -

n i s i and also contend that ,

i f a rule n i s i be issued,

no

case hes been

made

f o r t h e g r a n t o f I n t e r i m r e l i e f .

I

On

an applicacion such

2s

t h i s it

i s inappropr ia te

I

t o

deal

w i t h t h e f a c t s i n

any

g r e a t e r d e t a i l t h a n

i s necessary

f o r

an understanding of the issues which

now

a r i s e f o r

dec is ion .

,

There

i s evidence before

m e t ha t , a l t hough

izhe

Queensland Branch Secretary

i s

e lec ted

by

t h e members

of the

branch who Secre ta ry i s e l ec t ed by

a r e e l i g i b l e t o v o t e

and

the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

t h e members

of

that sub-branch,

t h e

s i t u a t i o n f o r

many

years has

been

t h a t t h e

same

person has

been e lec ted

to both of f ices .

A s

already

appears

that

pa t te rn of vo t ing d id not

emerge

a t t he r ecen t e l ec t ion ,

Hr. Ward Secretary and

defea t ing Mr.

Willj.ams

fo r t he pos i t i on o f

Branch

Mr.

Williams defeatmg

Mr.

17ard f o r t h e

pos i t i on

of

Secretary of the Brisbane Sab-Branch.

H i s to r i ca l ly the a f f a l r s o f t he Br i sbane

Sub-

Branch have been

administered from the ofEices

of

the

Queensland Branch

i n t h a t c i t y

and

the sub-branch has not

had separate Branch d iEfers from

premises

.

In

this

respect

the

Brisbane

Sub-

some

of

the other sub-branches where

off ice premises are provlded

by

the Queensland Branch

for

a .

I

zho

irse

of

the honorary secretary of the sub-branch,

t h e

s:?-grEnch

executive

and

the branch organizer per-

forming dut ies

in

the a rea .

The

mode

of operat ing

the

Brisbane Sub-Branch

was no doubt a convenient one when

the Queensland Branch Secretary also occupled the honorary

o f f i c e of

Brisbane

Sub-Eranch

Secretary.

The

records

maintained

in respect of the

membership

of

the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

are

kept

a t

t he o f f i ce o f t he

Queensland Branch

and

the records

so main ta ined are the only

set

of

records

kept

i n respec t of the

membership

o f

that sub-branch.

1

Other sub-branches maintain the records relating to sub-

branch mezbership and

a

copy

of

those records

i s kept a t

t h e o f f i c e

of

t h e

Queensland Branch.

It of 15 March 1984 must be considered.

i s aga ins t

t h i s

background tha t

t he r e so lu t ion

The

main

t h r u s t

of

the appl icants ' a t tack on

the resolut ion concerns those par ts

of

IC

.which

purport to

appoint Kr. Williams as a Branch

Organizer

~ r i t h

a

sa la ry

and allowance,

rrhich

purport

to give

him

Eree access to a l l

sections of the Queensland Eranch Offices, which dlrect

tha t he car ry out

organising

d u t i e s i n a l l p a r t s

of

the

Brisbane Sub-Eranch and

a s s l s t i n

a l l

other mat ters re levant

t o t h e

Queensland 2ranch and require

that

a l l Brisbane

Sub-Branch Organizers report verbally

and

i n w r i t i n g t o

him

on

a l l m a t t e r s , i n c l u d l n g a l l d i s p u t e s , w i t h

an obllgation

9 .

-..--

o n

MT.

' . ! ~ ~ ~ i . a m s t o n o t i f y t h e

Branch Secretary

of a l l

sucn

r i 1 2 C Z 2 Z S .

In suppor t o f the submiss ion tha t those par t s of

t he r e so lu t ion

are

con t ra ry to the ru l e s , t he app l i can t s

r e f e r t o r u l e s 2 2 ( b )

(iii)

,

2 2 ( g ) ,

30 (d) ( T V ) ,

3 0 ( e ) , 3 2 ( e ) ,

and

33(a) (vi i ) .

Those ru les provide

-

"22 (b)

Subjec t

to

para (a) hereof

a

person

i s

e l i g i b l e t o h o l d t h e o f f i c e

.of

-

(yhether e l ec t ed o r

(iii) Organizer

appoin ted) ; i f he

i s a

f i n a n c i a l member

of

the

Union

cont inuous ly for the prev ious

three years

and

i s

f inanc ia l a t

the

t

ime of

his

nominat

ion for

e

lect

ion (or

appointment

as

the case

may

be) but not otherwise."

"22 (g)

A

person

i s n o t e l i g i b l e t o

nominate

f o r e l e c t i o n t o

more

than one

o f f i c e

where the off ices concerned are

fu l i - t ime sa l a r i ed o f f i ces . "

"30 (d )

1~7ithout l imi t ing its powers

i n any

v7ay

each Branch Committee cf

Manage-

ment

s h a l l have power

to :

...

(%v)

Determine

whether

organizers

s h a l l

be

e lec ted or appoin ted

and t h e numbsr of such

o r g m i -

z e r s ,

and

to

reduce

the

number

T T

a t any t ime;

"30 (e)

All

paid ofElcers , Organizers

and employees of

a

Eranch

s h a l l be

sub jec t

t o the con t ro l

and

direction of

the

Branch

Committee of Xanagement as expressed through

the

Eranch

Secretary."

"32

The

d u t i e s o f ... Eranch

Organizers

s h a l l be

as hereunder:

.....

1 0 .

( S )

Organizers :

(i) Branch

Orgznizers

shall

be

e l i g i b l e f o r e l e c t i o n

on

t h e

Branch Cornittee of

Hanagement .

(ii) Branch

Organizers

s h a l l

assist

i n t h e

work

of the Branch gen-

e r a l l y ,

and

d ischarge such dut ies

a s may

be

a l l o t t e d t o

them by

t h e

Branch

Secretary.

A l l moneys

co l lec ted

by

them

s h a l l b e p a i d

ove r t o the

Branch

Secre ta ry

I

I ,

within one

week

of

c o l l e c t i o n .

“33 (a)

E l e c t i o n s

s h a l l

be held i n 1979

and every three years thereaf te r for the fo l low-

ing

Branch

Cf f i ce r s

and

representa t ives :

1

.

....

[v i i )

Branch Orgsriizers i n e a c h Branch which has de temined tha t an e lec t ioa

I ,

i s r equ i r ed to

f i l l such pos i t ions .

The

app l i can t s a rgue tha t t he

rules,

on

t h e i r

p roper cons t ruc t ion , requi re tha t

a

choice be

made

by

t h e

Branch Cornittee

of FIanagement whether Branch Organizers

a r e t o

be elected or appointed

and

tha t , apa r t f rom the

s i t u a t i o n v h e r e t h e r e

i s

a

casual vacancy to

be

f i l l e d

f o r which

rule

34 makes

provis ion ,

i t i s not permiss ib le

t o have

sone

elected

and some appointed

organizers.

The

pos i t ion be lng tha t

all pos i t ions

of

Branch Organizer

were

r e c e n t l y f i l l e d

by

e lec t ion ,

the appl icants submi t

that

the appointment

oE

Mr.

Williams rrithout election

C O

such

a

pos i t ion

i s

incons i s t en t w i th

the

ru l e s .

i t

i s

pointed owt

t h a t , a s

Mr.

Williams normnated

for

election

t o

t he sa l a r i ed fu l l - t lme pos i t i on

of Branch Secretary,

’ne could nor: under the rules

have nominated f o r or been

electsd

an

office

of

Branch

Organizer

(sub-rule

2 2 ( g ) )

It

::CS

zrgued

tha t , un le s s t he cons t ruc t ion o f

the

r u l e s

conten6ed f o r by

appl icants i s accepted,

the r u l e s 170uld

be

con t r l ry to sec t ion 133(1 ) ( a ) o f t he Ac t .

I

am

n o t s a t i s f i e 6 t h a t t h i s

l a t te r

submission

can be r e so lved the ques t ion whe the r t he ru l e s on the i r p rope r

sustained

b u t t o s a y t h i s ,

o f

course,

leaves 1.111-

construction have the

meaning whlch

t h e a p p l i c a n t s

seek

t o a s c r i b e t o

them.

For

the app l i can t s

i t

i s

a l so submi t t ed tha t

t he

r e s o l u t i o n o p e r a t e s t o e l e v a t e

i l r .

bJilliams

to

Eull-t ime

s t a t u s i n t h e

Queensland Branch Office and

that

i n so

f a r

as

i t

does

so

and

con ta ins p rov l s ions anc i l l a ry to tha t

e leva t ion

it

is

con t r a ry to the ru l e s r e l a t ing to the

posit ion

of

Branch

Secretary.

It

i s said

t h a t

t h e p r o -

v i s ions of the

rules

conferr ing

porrei-s

and

r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s

on

t h e

Branch

Secre ta ry a re such tha t

he

i s

proper ly

descr ibed as the ch ief adnin is t ra t ive of€ icer

of

t h e

Queensland

Branch.

?,eference

i s made t o a number of

p r o v i s i o n s i n t h e r u l e s

as

s u p p o r t i n g t h i s v i m

of

the

Branch Secretary's posit ion but for present purposes

it

i s

s u f f l c i e n t

t o

r e f e r

t o s u b - r u l e s

30(a) ,

30 (e ) , 32 (c )

and

32(e) (ii).

Sub-rule

30(a)

provldes

that

the

Branch

Secretary

i s t o be a member

of the Eranch

Committee o f Management by

1 2 .

I

v i r t u e

of

his

holding the off ice of Branch Secretary.

The t s x

r 2 f

sub-rules

30 (e ) and

32(e) (ii)

have

a l ready

I

been

sec

cut.

Sub-rule

32(c)

provides

-

"32 .

The dut les

of

Branch

OEficers

.... s h a l l be

as hereunder.

. . . .

(c )

Secre ta ry :

The

Branch

Secretary

s h a l l be

competent

to d ischarge

a l l d u t i e s a s s i g n e d t o

him

by

t h e

Branch Commlttee of

Management,

and

s h a l l a t t e n d

a l l meetings connected

with

the

Branch

when prac t icable .

He

sha l l a t t end to a l l co r re spondence ,

keep

a copy of

a l l l e t t e r s and r r i r e s

despatched.

He

s h a l l give an o f f i c i a l

r e c e i p t f o r

all moneys

received,

and

bank

such moneys

t o t h e c r e d i t

o f

t h e

Branch a t

l e a s t

weekly.

He

s h a l l

keep a l l documents

books

and

accounts

re la t ing

to

the

business

of

the

Branch.

He

s h a l l i s s u e n o t i c e s t o

members,

pa r t i cu la r ly to those

who

a r e i n

a r r ea r s

w

l

th

t he i r

dues .

he

s h a l l

hand over t o t h e

Branch Auditor

a l i

proper ty , books,

documents

and

moneys

belonging to the

Branch

within twenty-four hours

or'

being

requested to

do

so by

r e so lu t lon

passed a t

any meeting

of the Branch

Comiiittee

of

Management.

He

s h a l l

fur

ther

discharge such dut

ies

as

may

be

a l l o c a t e d t o

him

from time

t o time by t h e Branch

Committef:

of

'fiianagement.

He

s h a l l , i f deemed

necessary,

f

ind securi

ty

in such

a

sum

as

the

Branch Commlttee

oE

Nanagement may decide,

the premium

t o be paid by t h e Branch.

He

s h a l l

be allowed

a sum not exceeding $100

as determined

by

the Branch Comit tee

of Xanagement

from time

t o t i n e .

Such

moun t ,

once determlned,

shall

be reimbursed by cheque dra1.m from

the

Branch

Bank

account for pet ty

cash , to

be drawn by

chequc

from

t h e

Branch

General

Fund

account.

T h e

Sec re t a ry sha l l

be

custodian

of

t h e

moveable property oE the Branch.

Notwlthstandmg

anythmg

contained

e l sewl l r re in these ru les he sha l l

a l so

be

in sole charge of the

Branch

o f f i c e and

those

employees

connected with the

r.jorlc

thereof ."

The

r e so lu t ion

i s

s a i d

t o erode the funct ions

which

t h e r u l e s c o m i t

t o

t h e

Branch

Secre ta ry .

The

submission

i s

pu t t ha t , r ead ing the r e so lu t ion

as

a

whole

inc luding ,

i n par t icular ,

the preamble,

M r .

Williams'

appointmenc was

made

not

so

that he could undertake

what

may

be

descr ibed as the ordinary tucies of

a

Branch Organizer

'I

i n

the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

a rea o r a s d i r ec t ed

by the Branch

Sec re t a ry bu t i n o rde r t ha t he

mighr:

occupy

a

p o s i t i o n a s

an intersediary between the

Branch

Secre ta ry and

t h e

Branch

Organizers performing duty

i n t h e S r l s b a n e

Sub-Branch

a rea ,

thus breaking the chain

o f

ccnunand

cha t the ru les prescr ibe .

Such

an

ap?ointment

i s

s a i d t o

be contrary

to

sub-rules

32 ( c )

and

32 ( e ) (ii)

.

A

submission

i s

a l so

made

t h a t t h e r e s o l u t i o n ,

i n so fer as i t provides

for

the appointment

o€ Hr.

Williams

as the co -o rdmato r

and minute secretary

of the Transport

Workers'

iinion Safety

Committee

and

the Transport Workers'

Union - TLTA Trade Union Training Committee with power t o

call

meetings

of

those committees

2s

deemed necessary i s

beyond

the powers of

the Branch

C o n l t t e e o f

Management.

Reference

1 s

made

to sub- ru le 32(c) .

The

app l i can t s a l so a t t ack tha t pa r t o f t he

r e s o l ~ : z 5 ~

purpor t ing to aa tho r i se

Fir-

Williams

t o i s s u e

press sca tenents . the Qceensland Branch

They

r e f e r

t o

a reso lu t ion passed

by

Committee of Management on 1 6 Feb-

ruary

1 9 8 4

h

ths fol lot i ing terms

-

“That the policy

of

t h i s

Union

in r e spec t o f

Press Statements being

made

i s t h a t t h e

Branch

Secre ta ry be

s o l e l y r e s p o n s i b l e f o r

a l l media

11

scatements and releases.

The

ap?lFcants a lso

refer

to

;ab-rule

47(c) which prescribes

a

procsdure to be fol lowed for the recansiderat ion of the

s u b j e c r a a t t e r o f

any

resolution of the Branch

Committee

of Management,

a procedure which

was c lear ly not fo l lowed

i n t h e i n s t a n t c a s e .

The

respondents concede

that

the

procedures

prescr ibed by

r u l e

47

57ere

not follorred and have stated

to the Cour t t he i r i n t en t ion no t

t o

proceed

to implement

tha t pa r t o f t he

resolution

pending the f inal determinat ion

of the matter .

The

respondents contend

that

the appl

icants‘

submlsslons

(other

than

that

12st

r e f e r r e d t o )

f a i l t o

g ive due weight

t o the p rov i s lons

of sub-ru le

30(a)

providing that the Branch Corni t tee of

Management

i s ,

sub jecc to the ru l e s ,

t o

have control of

a l l

business

oE the t o o p e r a t e

Union

wi th in the a rea

over

which

i t

1 s

cons t i tu ted

and

sub-rule 30(e) providing

t h a t

a l l paid

ofEicers , organizers and

employees a r e .sub-ject t o t h e

15

concrs l 2-5

d i r e c t i o n of the Branch Commlttee

of Hanage-

l e n t

1 s =->:-Pressed through

the

Branch

Secretary.

The

appl icEncs respod th2t sub- ru le 30(a)

i s

expressed

to

be

subjec t

t o t h e r u l e s

a

d

cannot operate

to cut

doxm

the

s p e c i f i c powers

given

tothe

Branch

Secretary.

A s

t o

sub-

ru l e 30 (e ) t he app l i czn t s s ay tha t t he r e so lu t ion

does not

I

g i v e t h e

Branch Secrezary instruction as to

how

he

should

per form his fu lc t ions

o r

e x e r c i s e h i s

powers under

the

ru l e s bu t pu rpor t s t o cake

powers

away

from h i n

and

confer

them upon Mr. Williams.

It i s not a?.

easy task

t o reconci le what appear

on

t h e s u r f a c e t o

be

confl ic t ing provis ions of the rules

in def ln ing the respecc lve powers , func t ions

and

dut ies

of

t h e Branch Secretar::

and

the

Branch

Committee

of

Management. In essenc2,

the

dlfferences

between

the

.

p a r t i e s

would

appear

t o

stem from the emphasis +Ich

they

r e spec t ive ly p l ace on ua r t i cu la r p rov i s ions

oE

t h e

r u l e s .

Both the app l i can t s

a ~ d

the

respondents

concede

chat

each

r u l e must

be

read

i n

contes t

o f

the

ru les

as a whole.

The appl icants ,

hov.ever,

s r y t h a t

t h e

s p e c i f l c

r u l e s

ident i fy lng the func t ions

o f

the var ious Srznch of f ic ia l s

a r e n o t t o

be

read

doxx

3y

r e fe rence to the gene ra l

powers

conferred upon the

Brezch

Comnittee

o f

Managemen:.

For

the

respondents

the

po:;ers of the Branch Commlctee of

Efanagement are sa id

to be paramount.

16.

Xhat I have

sald

i s ,

I

t h i n k , s u f i i c l e n t t o

sho7.i ~ 5 2 ~

there

are

arguable

issues

between the par

t

ies

which

should

be

the subJecc o f f ina l r e so lu t ion

by

the

Court.

I , therefore ,

propose

to

accede

to

the

appl icants '

r e q u e s t t h a t

a

r u l e nisi be

i ssued .

7:

a m

a l so

of

opinion that the appl icants have

shoIm

a

su f f i c i en t ly s t rong case

i n r e l a t i o n t o

some

aspec ts

o f t he r e so lu t ion

t o

amount

t o

a

p robab i l i t y ( in the sense

exp la ined in

Beecham

Group

Ltd. v.

B r i s t o l

Laboraror les

I

P ty . L td . ( sup ra ) )

t ha t a t

t he hea r ing they

will

be held

e n t l t l e d

t o

r e l i e f .

I n

r e a c h i n g

t h i s c o n c l u s i o n

I

have

n o t ,

of

course, underteken

a

p r e l i m i n a r y t r i a l o f t h e

i ssues .

The

p a r t i c u l a r p a r t s

of

t h e r e s o l u t i o n i n r e l a t i o n t o

xhich I have

rcached

this

conclusion are those par ts of

i t

uhlch

purport

to appolnr:

Hr. NIlliams as a Branch Organizer

and

t o d i r e c t t h e o t h e r

Branch Organizers perforning

du ty

In

the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

a r e a t o r e p o r t t o

him

and

not

t o t h e

Branch Secretary

and those par ts of

i t which purport

to

give Mr.

Nil l iams free access

t o

a l l s e c t i o n s of the

Queensland Branch offices and require that stafE

2 t

present

employed i n

t h o s e o f f i c e s

be

made

ava i l ab le

to

the S r i sbane

Sub-Eranch Secretary

and be

r e spons ib l e to

him.

I

am

not satlsr 'xed chat

the

applicants

have

shown

a

su f f i c i en t ly s t rong case

m

respec t of o ther par t s

of

the re so lu t ion

(assumrng a s I

do

f o r t h i s

purpose

that

I t s

par ts

are

sexrerable)

In

par t icular

I

am

not

so

s a t i s f i e d

1 7 .

I n rss32c1

of

those

parts

of the reso lu t ion tha t purpor t

-

co meke

avEilable to the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

Secretary

room

2 1 ,

?irst

Floor, Trades

H a l l ,

Brisbane

(with

appropriate

f ac i l i t i e s t he re in ) fo r t he pu r?ose o f conduc t ing the bus iness (including meetings) of the Brisbane Sub-Lranch and i t s

I

o f f i c e r s

and

those pa r t s o f t he r e so lu t ion

which

would

give the Brisbane

Sub-Branch

Secre ta ry access to the

only se t o f

membership

r eco rds in ex i s t ence r e l a t ing to

members

o f

t ha t

Sub-Branch.

I n t h e

l i g h t

of

t h e

a t t i t u d e

taken by pu rpor t ing to au tho r i se

the respondents to t&c par t of the resolut ion

F I r .

Williems

t c i s s u e p r e s s s t a t e -

ments I r e l i e f i n r e l a t i o n t h e r e t o .

have

no

need

to cons ider the ques t ion of In te r im

The balance of convenience seems t o me

t o

favour the gran t of in te r im re l le f

t o

t he app l i can t s i n

r e l a t i o n t o t h e c a r r y i n g i n t o e i f e c c

or‘

those par t s

oE

the

r e s o l u t i o n i d e n t i f i e d

above

in respec t of

wh.r’ch I

have

concluded that thc appl lcants hme

shovm

a

p robab i l i t y

I

t h a t a t

che hearing they

will

be

h e l d e n t i t l e d

t o r e l i e f .

For these reasons I

order tha t a r u l e -

n i s i

i s sue ca l l i ng

upon the respondents

t o show cause on a

da te

and

a t

a

time

t o be

n o t i f i e d t o t h e p a r t i e s

why

orders should not be

made

under sectlon

141

of

t h e

Act

that

the

respondents

observe

rules

2 2 ,

30 ,

3 2 ,

33 and

47

of

the rules

of

the

Union and orders

in

terms

of those

set

out

in sub-paragraphs

1 t o 11 inc lus ive of paragraph A

18.

b

r

!

r 1

o r zr-2 ~ ~ ~ L c a t i o n

datecl

1 9 March

1984

f i l e d i n t h e s e

prcczs&:-=s

D

on beha1.f

o f the appl icants .

I

fur ther order

thar.

cke

respondents be res t ra ined unt l l the f ina l de te r -

mination

of

t h i s matter

or furcher order

from

g iv ing e f f ec t

t o so much

of the reso lu t lon

of

t h e Committee

of

Management

of

t h e Queensland Branch of the

Union

ca r r i ed

on

15 March

1984

as

provides

that

-

(1)

the

Brisbane

Sub-Branch Secre ta ry Hughie

Wi1liar.s be apTointed as

a

Branch Organizer;

(2 )

a l l Branch

Organizers

performing

duty

i n

the Brisbane Sub-Brmch area report

verbally

and

i n wr i t ing to the Br isbane

Sub-Branch

Secre ta ry

on

a l l m a t t e r s , i n c l u d i n g

a l l

d isputes ;

t

(3)

the

Brisbane

Sub-Brznch Secretary

have

!

f r ee access

to

a l l s e c t i o n s o f t h e

Queensland Branch Offices

and complete

access

to correspondence

and

documents

of the Queensland Branch provided that

t h i s o rde r sha l l no t p reven t t h s Br i sbane

Sub-Branch Secretary ha-ring access to

the membership records of the Queensland

Branch

r c l d t i n g t o t h e

members

of the

Brisbane

Sab-Branch;

and

(4)

t h e Queensland

Branch

make

aval lab le

to

the Brisba&

Sub-Branch

Sec re t a ry s t a f f

a t p re sen t

employed

by

the Queensland

Eranch and performing duty

i n t h e

Queensland

Eranch

Offlces.

The

cos ts of the appl ica t lon a re reserved .

I

c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s

and

the preceding

eighteen (18) pages a r c a t r u e copy of

!

the Keasoss f o r Judgment herein 01 the

Ilonourable

! v i r

Jus’ij cc:

Neaves.

28 March

1 9 S &

l

r

- .

-

h

.

-

:

-

-

-

I

I Assoclate

19.

Details
AGLC
Ward, Leonard Edward v Williams, Hughie [1984] FCA 60
Case
[1984] FCA 60
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Court of Australia was asked to decide if a decision made by the Branch Committee of Management of the Queensland Branch of the Transport Workers' Union of Australia was in line with the Union's rules. The applicants, members of the Union, argued that the resolution passed by the Branch Committee of Management on 15 March 1984 was contrary to the Union's rules and should be set aside. The resolution, among other things, appointed Hughie Williams as a Branch Organizer, granted him access to all sections of the Queensland Branch offices, and required Branch Organizers to report to him on all matters, including disputes. The applicants claimed this resolution was contrary to certain rules of the Union and should be set aside. The court found that there were arguable issues between the parties that should be resolved by the court. The court also found that the applicants had shown a sufficiently strong case regarding certain aspects of the resolution to amount to a probability that they would be entitled to relief at the hearing. The court granted the applicants' request for a rule nisi and ordered the respondents to show cause why orders should not be made under section 141 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904, giving directions for the performance or observance by the respondents of certain rules of the Union. The court further ordered that the respondents be restrained from giving effect to certain parts of the resolution until the final determination of the matter or further order.

The final orders of the court were that the respondents appear before the Federal Court of Australia to show cause why orders should not be made under section 141 of the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904, giving directions for the performance or observance by the respondents of certain rules of the Union and orders in terms of those set out in sub-paragraphs 1 to 11 inclusive of paragraph A of the application dated 19 March 1984 filed on behalf of the applicants. The court also ordered that the respondents be restrained until the final determination of the matter or further order from giving effect to certain parts of the resolution of the Committee of Management of the Queensland Branch of the Union carried on 15 March 1984. The costs of the application were reserved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.