[2014] FWC 4444 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Wanslea Early Learning & Development Inc
(AG2014/1564)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SMITH | MELBOURNE, 3 JULY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Wanslea Early Learning and Development Inc Enterprise Agreement 2014 - notice of employee representational rights did not comply with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 — application for approval dismissed.
[1] This is an application to approve an enterprise agreement titled the Wanslea Early Learning and Development Inc Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement).
[2] There are three broad areas of concern with the Agreement. Issues concerning the better off overall test and individual flexibility term could be resolved by way of an undertaking, however, the notice of employee representational rights does not comply with the requirements of section 174(1A) of the Fair Work Act 2009 and regulation 2.05 and schedule 2.1 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009. The application must fail. 1
[3] I refuse to approve the Agreement.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
1 Peabody Moorvale Pty Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2014] FWCFB 2042.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR552733>
- AGLC
- Wanslea Early Learning & Development Inc [2014] FWC 4444
- Case
- [2014] FWC 4444
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the requirements for the notice of employee representational rights. It was noted that the notice must be in writing and provide employees with clear and concise information about their right to be represented by a union or other employee representative during the bargaining process. The Commission examined the notice provided by Wanslea Early Learning and Development Inc and found that it did not meet the statutory requirements, as it failed to provide adequate information about the employees' rights and the process for exercising those rights. As a result, the application for approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2014 was dismissed.
Given the non-compliance with the statutory requirements for the notice of employee representational rights, the Commission concluded that the application for approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2014 could not be granted. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that employees are properly informed of their rights and the bargaining process, and that any deficiencies in the notice could potentially undermine the fairness and effectiveness of the agreement. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed, and the Enterprise Agreement 2014 was not approved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.