Wang v Botany View Hotel (No 2)

Case

[2017] NSWCA 298

24 November 2017


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Wang v Botany View Hotel (No 2) [2017] NSWCA 298 [2017] NSWCA 298 24 November 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Wang v Botany View Hotel (No 2)*, the applicant sought to set aside orders previously made by the Court of Appeal. The respondent, Botany View Hotel, was the other party to the proceedings.

The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the applicant had established grounds to set aside the Court's earlier orders pursuant to rule 36.16(3A) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW). This rule permits a court to set aside its own judgment or order in certain circumstances, including where an oral hearing is not warranted.

The Court of Appeal reasoned that the applicant's grounds for setting aside the orders were incomprehensible and did not identify any identifiable error that would justify such an action. Consequently, the Court concluded that an oral hearing was not warranted and dismissed the applicant's notice of motion.

The applicant's notice of motion filed on 16 October 2017 was dismissed with costs.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Appeal

  • Costs

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Res Judicata

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
High Court Bulletin [2018] HCAB 5

Cases Citing This Decision

1

High Court Bulletin [2018] HCAB 5
Cases Cited

3

Statutory Material Cited

1

Wang v Botany View Hotel [2017] NSWCA 249
Majak v Rose (No 5) [2017] NSWCA 238