Wallis And Anor and Solomon And Ors (Costs)
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 1149
•4 November 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Wallis And Anor and Solomon And Ors (Costs) [2009] FamCA 1149
[2009] FamCA 1149
4 November 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Wallis And Anor and Solomon And Ors (Costs)*, Justice Austin of the Supreme Court of New South Wales considered an application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the parties, Wallis and Solomon, is not detailed in the provided text, but the focus of this judgment is solely on the costs application.
The sole legal issue before the Court was whether to grant the oral application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer.
Justice Austin determined that the application for costs should be dismissed. The reasoning behind this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the Court formally entertained the application before making its order.
Consequently, the Court ordered that the application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer be dismissed.
The sole legal issue before the Court was whether to grant the oral application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer.
Justice Austin determined that the application for costs should be dismissed. The reasoning behind this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the Court formally entertained the application before making its order.
Consequently, the Court ordered that the application for costs made by the Independent Children’s Lawyer be dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1