| [2014] FWCA 9193 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Walker Stores Pty Ltd
(AG2014/10198)
WALKER STORES PTY LTD TECHNICAL SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 23 DECEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Walker Stores Pty Ltd Technical Services Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Walker Stores Pty Ltd Technical Services Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Walker Stores Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 31 December 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 23 December 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE411848 PR559205>
- AGLC
- Walker Stores Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 9193
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 9193
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the technical services enterprise agreement 2014 was in the best interests of the employees. The agreement provided for a two-tier wage system, with new employees being paid less than existing employees for the same work. The union argued that this two-tier wage system was unfair and not in the best interests of the employees. The employer argued that the two-tier wage system was necessary to ensure the business could remain competitive and sustainable, and therefore in the best interests of the employees.
The court found that the two-tier wage system was not in the best interests of the employees. The court found that the two-tier wage system created an unfair disparity in pay between new and existing employees, and that this disparity was not justified by the employer's need to remain competitive and sustainable. The court also found that the employer had failed to demonstrate that the two-tier wage system was necessary to achieve these objectives. The court concluded that the agreement was not in the best interests of the employees and dismissed the application for approval of the technical services enterprise agreement 2014.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.