| [2025] FWCA 1722 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd
(AG2025/1445)
WAGSTAFF PILING PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU (VICTORIAN CONSTRUCTION AND GENERAL DIVISION) SUBCONTRACTORS PILING ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024 - 2027
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BELL | MELBOURNE, 23 MAY 2025 |
Application for approval of the Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Piling Enterprise Agreement 2024 - 2027
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd and the CFMEU (Victorian Construction and General Division) Subcontractors Piling Enterprise Agreement 2024 - 2027 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Having regard to the material contained in the application and filed in relation to it, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188, 193 and 193A as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer. However, taking into account the factors in sections 186(3) and (3A), I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
The Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement was approved on 23 May 2025 and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 May 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 July 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE529120 PR787552>
- AGLC
- Wagstaff Piling Pty Ltd [2025] FWCA 1722
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 1722
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the procedural requirements set out in the Fair Work Act, whether it was free from any unfair content, and whether it was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission examined the process by which the agreement was negotiated and whether it was done in good faith. Additionally, the Commission assessed the content of the agreement to ensure it did not have any provisions that were unfair or detrimental to the employees.
In reaching its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was negotiated in good faith and followed the necessary procedural requirements. The Commission also determined that the agreement did not contain any unfair provisions and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission noted the benefits of the agreement, such as improved wages, conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms, which would positively impact the employees. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement, recognising its potential to provide fair and equitable outcomes for the workforce.
The Fair Work Commission approved the proposed enterprise agreement, finding it to be fair and in the best interests of the employees. This decision highlights the importance of fair negotiation processes and the need for agreements to benefit the workforce while complying with legislative requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.