WADFORD & CAFFERTY (No.3)
Case
•
[2019] FCCA 3687
•16 December 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
WADFORD & CAFFERTY (No.3) [2019] FCCA 3687
[2019] FCCA 3687
16 December 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned proceedings in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia at Brisbane, presided over by Judge Spelleken. The specific nature of the dispute between the parties, Wadford and Cafferty, is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that it is the third iteration of proceedings, indicated by "(No.3)".
The court was required to make directions regarding the future conduct of the proceedings. Specifically, the court needed to determine the timeframe for a further hearing and the date upon which the matter would be mentioned for trial directions. These directions were to include consideration of the necessity for obtaining further reports, such as those from medical practitioners or family report writers.
Judge Spelleken ordered that the matter be listed for a further hearing of no more than two days, commencing at 10:00 am on 17 September 2020. Additionally, the court directed that the matter be listed for mention at 9:30 am on 20 July 2020, for the purpose of making trial directions. These directions were to encompass the determination of whether any further reports, including those from medical practitioners and/or family report writers, were necessary.
The court was required to make directions regarding the future conduct of the proceedings. Specifically, the court needed to determine the timeframe for a further hearing and the date upon which the matter would be mentioned for trial directions. These directions were to include consideration of the necessity for obtaining further reports, such as those from medical practitioners or family report writers.
Judge Spelleken ordered that the matter be listed for a further hearing of no more than two days, commencing at 10:00 am on 17 September 2020. Additionally, the court directed that the matter be listed for mention at 9:30 am on 20 July 2020, for the purpose of making trial directions. These directions were to encompass the determination of whether any further reports, including those from medical practitioners and/or family report writers, were necessary.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Discovery
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0