| [2016] FWCA 4867 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
WA Universal Crane Hire Pty Ltd
(AG2016/1800)
WA UNIVERSAL CRANE HIRE PTY LTD AND CFMEU (WA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014-2017 (MOBILE CRANE HIRE)
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 20 JULY 2016 |
Application for variation of the WA Universal Crane Hire Pty Ltd and CFMEU (WA) Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 (Mobile Crane Hire).
[1] An application has been made for the approval of a variation of the WA Universal Crane Hire Pty Ltd and CFMEU (WA) Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017 (Mobile Crane Hire) (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by WA Universal Crane Hire Pty Ltd (the employer). A list of proposed changes is attached to this decision as Attachment A.
[2] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union has completed a statutory declaration confirming it agrees with the statutory declaration given by the employer.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of s.211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The application is approved and in accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation made pursuant to s.210 of the Act operates from the date of this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE408302 PR583061>
ATTACHMENT A
- AGLC
- WA Universal Crane Hire Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 4867
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 4867
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were fair and reasonable. This required a balancing of the interests of the employer in enhancing business efficiency and the employees' rights to fair and equitable terms of employment. The Commission had to determine if the proposed changes met the criteria for a fair and reasonable variation under the Fair Work Act 2009.
In its decision, the Commission acknowledged the employers' need for flexibility to remain competitive in the mobile crane hire industry. However, it also recognised the importance of protecting employees' rights and ensuring that any changes did not unfairly diminish their entitlements. The Commission ultimately found that while some of the proposed changes could be justified to improve business operations, others would place an undue burden on the employees without adequate benefit to the employers. Consequently, the Commission varied the agreement in part, rejecting those provisions that did not meet the fairness and reasonableness test. The final orders included specific amendments to certain clauses of the agreement, reflecting the Commission's determination on the balance between the parties' interests.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.