VR v Commission for Children and Young People

Case

[2012] NSWADT 83

04 May 2012


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
VR v Commission for Children and Young People [2012] NSWADT 83 [2012] NSWADT 83 04 May 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved an application by VR for a declaration that certain sections of the Commission for Children and Young People Act 1998 did not apply to him in respect of certain offences. The respondent, the Commission for Children and Young People, opposed the application on the basis that VR had not discharged the onus of proving that he posed no risk to the safety of children. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.
The legal issues before the court were whether VR had discharged the onus of proving that he posed no risk to the safety of children and whether the conditions imposed by the court were appropriate in the circumstances. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and the relevant legislative provisions in making its decision.
The court found that VR had discharged the onus of proving that he posed no risk to the safety of children. The court noted that VR had taken steps to address his offending behaviour and had not reoffended since his conviction. The court also considered that the conditions imposed on VR were appropriate in the circumstances, given his previous offending and the need to protect children from harm. The court noted that the conditions imposed would ensure that VR did not undertake employment involving children under the age of 18 years and would provide relevant employers with information about his previous offending.
The court made the orders sought by VR, declaring that Division 2 of Part 7 of the Commission for Children and Young People Act 1998 did not apply to him in respect of the relevant offences, subject to certain conditions. These conditions included that VR not undertake employment involving children under the age of 18 years, that he provide relevant employers with information about his previous offending, and that he provide a copy of the court's reasons to the Australian Medical Council if he applied for registration as a medical practitioner. The court also requested that the Registrar provide a copy of the orders to the Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Human Rights Law

Legal Concepts

  • Jurisdiction

  • Natural Justice & Procedural Fairness

  • Legitimate Expectation

  • Unconscionable Conduct

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

4

BMZ v Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCATAD 81
BMZ v Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCATAD 81
Cases Cited

4

Statutory Material Cited

5

R v Hamze [2005] NSWSC 136