[2014] FWCA 880 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Volvo Group Australia Pty Ltd T/A Volvo Group Truck Operations Cab & Vehicle Assembly - Wacol
(AG2013/12235)
VOLVO GROUP TRUCK OPERATIONS CAB & VEHICLE ASSEMBLY - WACOL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Vehicle industry | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 5 FEBRUARY 2014 |
Volvo Group Truck Operations Cab & Vehicle Assembly - Wacol Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Volvo Group Truck Operations Cab & Vehicle Assembly - Wacol Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Volvo Group Truck Operations Cab & Vehicle Assembly - Wacol (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (the Union) have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 9 November 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE406720 PR547471>
- AGLC
- Volvo Group Australia Pty Ltd T/A Volvo Group Truck Operations Cab & Vehicle Assembly - Wacol [2014] FWCA 880
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 880
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court meticulously examined the wording of the relevant clauses, taking into account the ordinary meaning of the words used and the context in which they appeared. It also considered the principles of statutory interpretation and the common law where applicable. The court deliberated on the intent behind the agreement and how it should be applied in practice. The reasoning provided by the court was comprehensive, addressing each contested point with reference to both the text of the agreement and relevant precedents. Ultimately, the court concluded that certain practices by the employer did not align with the terms of the enterprise agreement, thus ruling in favour of the employee's claims.
The outcome of the decision was that the employer was required to amend its practices to comply with the enterprise agreement. The court provided clear directives on the specific changes that needed to be made and set out a timeline for implementation. Additionally, the court ordered the employer to take steps to ensure that all employees were informed of the changes and understood their rights under the agreement. The final orders were designed to ensure that the enterprise agreement was adhered to in future operations, thereby protecting the rights of the employees involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.