[2013] FWCA 4581 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Volvo Group Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2013/7075)
VOLVO GROUP AUSTRALIA RETAIL, MOD CENTRE AND VMR ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Vehicle industry | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 10 JULY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Volvo Group Australia Retail, Mod Centre and VMR Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known asthe Volvo Group Australia Retail, Mod Centre and VMR Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Volvo Group Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (the Union)has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they wish to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 April 2015.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE402309 PR538796>
- AGLC
- Volvo Group Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 4581
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 4581
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement met the "no disadvantage test" and "better off overall test" as required by the Fair Work Act. These tests ensure that the agreement does not place employees in a worse position than they were in under the previous agreement and that it provides overall benefits to the employees. The Commission had to consider whether the proposed changes in the agreement were fair and reasonable, particularly in light of the economic conditions and industry standards.
The Commission deliberated on the evidence presented, including submissions from both parties, and considered the specific provisions of the agreement. The Commission found that the proposed agreement was fair and reasonable, meeting the statutory requirements of the Act. It determined that employees would not be disadvantaged and would, in fact, be better off overall due to the provisions of the agreement. The Commission approved the agreement, highlighting its balanced approach to addressing the needs of both the employer and employees.
The final order of the Commission was the approval of the Volvo Group Australia Retail, Mod Centre and VMR Agreement 2013, effective from the date of the decision. This approval ensures that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement will govern the employment of the relevant employees, providing a framework for their working conditions and benefits.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.