Voller and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review)
Case
•
[2019] AATA 1336
•19 June 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Voller and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 1336
[2019] AATA 1336
19 June 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an appeal by Mr Voller against a decision by the Secretary of the Department of Social Services regarding his eligibility for a disability support pension (DSP). The sole issue before the Tribunal was whether Mr Voller's impairments, specifically myasthenia gravis and fibromyalgia, were assessable as severe under Table 1 of the Impairment Tables during the claim period of 9 October 2017 to 8 January 2018. Mr Voller had not participated in a program of support, meaning his eligibility hinged entirely on whether his impairments met the threshold for a 20-point rating under the Impairment Tables.
The Tribunal was required to determine if Mr Voller's impairments had a severe adverse functional impact on activities requiring physical exertion or stamina, which would qualify him for a 20-point rating under Table 1 of the Impairment Tables. This assessment was to be made specifically for the period between 9 October 2017 and 8 January 2018, irrespective of any subsequent eligibility for DSP. The Tribunal considered evidence from Mr Voller and a letter from his general practitioner, Dr Maung, dated 21 March 2018, which described the functional impacts of his fibromyalgia.
The Tribunal found that while Dr Maung's letter indicated a severe functional impact on physical exertion, it did not meet the specific criteria outlined in descriptor 1(a) of Table 1 of the Impairment Tables. Consequently, Mr Voller could not be assigned a rating of severe, or 20 points, under that table for the claim period. The Tribunal affirmed the decision under review.
The Tribunal was required to determine if Mr Voller's impairments had a severe adverse functional impact on activities requiring physical exertion or stamina, which would qualify him for a 20-point rating under Table 1 of the Impairment Tables. This assessment was to be made specifically for the period between 9 October 2017 and 8 January 2018, irrespective of any subsequent eligibility for DSP. The Tribunal considered evidence from Mr Voller and a letter from his general practitioner, Dr Maung, dated 21 March 2018, which described the functional impacts of his fibromyalgia.
The Tribunal found that while Dr Maung's letter indicated a severe functional impact on physical exertion, it did not meet the specific criteria outlined in descriptor 1(a) of Table 1 of the Impairment Tables. Consequently, Mr Voller could not be assigned a rating of severe, or 20 points, under that table for the claim period. The Tribunal affirmed the decision under review.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Voller and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2019] AATA 1336
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Re Fanning and Secretary, Department of Social Services
[2014] AATA 447
Gallacher v Secretary, Department of Social Services
[2015] FCA 1123